Cited by 17Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Dissociating veridicality, consistency, and confidence in autobiographical and event memories for the Columbia shuttle disaster

Abstract

A total of 449 students were tested for their event memories and autobiographical memories of hearing about the Columbia shuttle disaster of 1st February 2003. Four different groups were tested 2, 18, 27, or 51 days after the event. All participants were then re-tested after 5 months (second session) and again after 1 year (third session) from the first interview. Dissociations between consistency and confidence and between event and autobiographical memories were found. Consistency and confidence in event memories, but not in autobiographical memories, were affected by time. In contrast, repeated testing selectively enhanced autobiographical memories, in accordance with the narrative and rehearsal hypothesis of Neisser and Harsh (1992). For event memories, veridicality was inversely correlated to consistency, which in turn was inversely correlated to confidence, and mainly based on omissions. As regards veridicality, the analyses showed an increase of false memories at long time delays. Results are discussed with reference to recent studies contrasting autobiographical and event memories.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658210500477709

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 17

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90036-4 · DOI
  2. Bohannon J. N., 1992, Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memories, 4, 65, 10.1017/CBO9780511664069.005 · DOI
  3. Brandimonte M. A., 2004, Psicologia della memoria
  4. 10.1016/0010-0277(77)90018-X · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/741944919 · DOI
  6. Conway M. A., 2000, Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology
  7. 10.1002/acp.2350090102 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/acp.740 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/09658210042000120 · DOI
  10. Ebbinghaus H., 1885, Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology
  11. 10.1002/acp.870 · DOI
  12. Gardiner J. M., 2000, The Oxford handbook of memory, 229, 10.1093/oso/9780195122657.003.0015 · DOI
  13. Greenberg D. L., 2004, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 363, 10.1002/acp.1016 · DOI
  14. 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.481 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/acp.982 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0096-3445.117.2.171 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90011-1 · DOI
  18. Neisser U., 1982, Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts, 43
  19. 10.1002/acp.1005 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/096582196388898 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/acp.779 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/acp.984 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90036-2 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90037-4 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/acp.981 · DOI
  26. Talarico J. M., 2003, Psychological Science, 2003
  27. 10.1002/acp.985 · DOI
  28. Tulving E., 1985, Canadian Psychology, 26, 1, 10.1037/h0080017 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1037/0096-3445.122.1.39 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/096582100406775 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/acp.2350070205 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02675.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Coluccia, E., Bianco, C., & Brandimonte, M. A.
Affiliations
Università degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa (IT)
Corresponding author
Coluccia, Emanuele
Venue
Memory
Published
2006-05
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
452-470
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2017859230
Cited by
17
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
autobiographical memory, event memory, veridicality, memory confidence, memory consistency, false memory, time delay
MeSH terms
Disasters, Emotions, Humans, Life Change Events, Models, Psychological, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Space Flight, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review