Cited by 123Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyNostalgia and Consumer Behavior

Temporal distribution of favourite books, movies, and records: Differential encoding and re-sampling

Janssen, Steve M. J., Chessa, Antonio G., Murre, Jaap M. J.·2007·Memory

Abstract

The reminiscence bump is the effect that people recall more personal events from early adulthood than from childhood or adulthood. The bump has been examined extensively. However, the question of whether the bump is caused by differential encoding or re-sampling is still unanswered. To examine this issue, participants were asked to name their three favourite books, movies, and records. Furthermore,they were asked when they first encountered them. We compared the temporal distributions and found that they all showed recency effects and reminiscence bumps. The distribution of favourite books had the largest recency effect and the distribution of favourite records had the largest reminiscence bump. We can explain these results by the difference in rehearsal. Books are read two or three times, movies are watched more frequently, whereas records are listened to numerous times. The results suggest that differential encoding initially causes the reminiscence bump and that re-sampling increases the bump further.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658210701539646

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies show preferences for music from late adolescence and early adulthood.

    “This is consistent with previous studies showing preferences for music from late adolescence and early adulthood (Holbrook and Schindler, 1989; Schulkind et al., 1999; Janssen et al., 2007).”

    From Listening Niches across a Century of Popular Music (2017) · cites this paper as Janssen et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janssen, S. M. J., Chessa, A. G., & Murre, J. M. J.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Janssen, Steve M. J.
Venue
Memory
Published
2007-10
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
755-767
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W1987014316
Cited by
123
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Keywords
reminiscence bump, differential encoding, resampling, recency effect, rehearsal, autobiographical memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Autobiographies as Topic, Books, Humans, Middle Aged, Motion Pictures, Mental Recall, Records, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review