Loss or gain? The role of message framing in hotel guests’ recycling behaviour
Abstract
One of the major challenges for the tourism sector is enacting sustainable behaviours. A key strategy for hoteliers is developing persuasive messages, with the goal of encouraging guests’ voluntary participation in green programmes. Through the lens of prospect theory and construal level theory, the present study investigates to what extent a loss or gain-framed message influences recycling of hotel guests via a field and a laboratory experiment. The field experiment tests the moderating effect of message construal level (concrete or abstract) on the message frame that activate pro-environmental behaviour, while the laboratory study delves further into the mechanism by showing that perceived self-efficacy is the mechanism behind the activation of these behaviours. The findings from both studies suggest that hotel guests are more likely to engage in recycling behaviour when a concrete message is paired with a loss-framed message, because of a greater perceived self-efficacy. These results help to understand the theoretical psychological mechanisms and offer managerial implications for operators on how to engage guests to be active partners in sustainable tourism behaviours.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical studies in environmental psychology have consistently supported the applicability of Prospect Theory, demonstrating that loss-framed messages are generally more persuasive than gain-framed messages in encouraging pro-environmental behaviors.
“Empirical studies in environmental psychology have consistently supported the applicability of Prospect Theory, demonstrating that loss-framed messages are generally more persuasive than gain-framed messages in encouraging pro-environmental behaviors.”
From The power of loss: message framing, climate anxiety, and engagement in personal carbon trading (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524 · see citing works
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 17,604 · see citing works
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682 · see citing works
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018963 · Cited by 6,618 · see citing works
A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/586910 · Cited by 3,235 · cited 7× · see citing works
“…research has explored how to save on water and energy waste (Chan & Lam, 2003; Dolnicar et al., 2017), recycling waste (Radwan, Jones & Minoli, 2012; Shanklin, Petrillose & Pettay, 1991), and reusing hotel towels (Cvelbar, Gr€un & Dolnicar, 2017; Goldstein et al., 2008; Mair & Bergin-Seers, 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The power of loss: message framing, climate anxiety, and engagement in personal carbon trading
Li, T., Yang, Y., Liu, X., & Zeng, S. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03713-w · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grazzini, L., Rodrigo, P., Aiello, G., & Viglia, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Florence (IT)
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Grazzini, Laura
- Venue
- Journal of Sustainable Tourism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-11-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1944-1966
- ISSN
- 0966-9582 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7646
- OpenAlex
- W2898511685
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 15.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sustainable Tourism (publishedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- message framing, recycling behavior, hotel guests, loss framing, gain framing, construal level theory, prospect theory, self-efficacy, pro-environmental behavior, sustainable tourism, persuasive messages
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review