Cited by 230Environmental Education and SustainabilityEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Loss or gain? The role of message framing in hotel guests’ recycling behaviour

Grazzini, Laura, Rodrigo, Padmali, Aiello, Gaetano, Viglia, Giampaolo·2018·Journal of Sustainable Tourism

Abstract

One of the major challenges for the tourism sector is enacting sustainable behaviours. A key strategy for hoteliers is developing persuasive messages, with the goal of encouraging guests’ voluntary participation in green programmes. Through the lens of prospect theory and construal level theory, the present study investigates to what extent a loss or gain-framed message influences recycling of hotel guests via a field and a laboratory experiment. The field experiment tests the moderating effect of message construal level (concrete or abstract) on the message frame that activate pro-environmental behaviour, while the laboratory study delves further into the mechanism by showing that perceived self-efficacy is the mechanism behind the activation of these behaviours. The findings from both studies suggest that hotel guests are more likely to engage in recycling behaviour when a concrete message is paired with a loss-framed message, because of a greater perceived self-efficacy. These results help to understand the theoretical psychological mechanisms and offer managerial implications for operators on how to engage guests to be active partners in sustainable tourism behaviours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09669582.2018.1526294

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirical studies in environmental psychology have consistently supported the applicability of Prospect Theory, demonstrating that loss-framed messages are generally more persuasive than gain-framed messages in encouraging pro-environmental behaviors.

    “Empirical studies in environmental psychology have consistently supported the applicability of Prospect Theory, demonstrating that loss-framed messages are generally more persuasive than gain-framed messages in encouraging pro-environmental behaviors.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grazzini, L., Rodrigo, P., Aiello, G., & Viglia, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Grazzini, Laura
Venue
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
Published
2018-11-02
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
1944-1966
ISSN
  • 0966-9582 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7646
OpenAlex
W2898511685
Cited by
230
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
FWCI
15.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sustainable Tourism (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
message framing, recycling behavior, hotel guests, loss framing, gain framing, construal level theory, prospect theory, self-efficacy, pro-environmental behavior, sustainable tourism, persuasive messages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review