The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Use and Abuse of Models of Disability
Abstract
Throughout history, theorists have made use of the technology of the day to provide explanatory models of the behaviour they observe in order to provide an improved understanding of human behaviour. Bax (1998) describes the use of models of disability as not particularly helpful in relation to the treatment of children with physical disabilities. It is the purpose of this paper to show that models do have their place within disability research and the implications of using the medical and social models of disability, together with two models from developmental psychology, namely the transactional model and systems theory, will be discussed. It is argued by the authors that the usage of these models can aid understanding of disability in both research and clinical settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The conventional medical paradigm, also known as the medical model of disability (Llewellyn & Hogan, 2000; Marks, 1997), approaches autism as a disability primarily rooted within individuals.”
From Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science (2022) · cites this paper as Llewellyn & Hogan, 2000
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001 · Cited by 21,170
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10518-046 · Cited by 3,197
Ralston, C. W. (1992) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/00004703-199204000-00011 · Cited by 2,244
Psychological perspectives on the self
Hampson, S. E. (1985) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90049-2 · Cited by 807
Processes underlying the construction, maintenance and enhancement of the self-concept in children
Harter, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 469
The classification of disability.
Hutchison, T. (1995) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.73.2.91 · Cited by 71
Johnston, M. (1996) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.3109/09593989609036429 · Cited by 71
Conceptual Issues in Psychology
HEIL, B. J. (1983) · Philosophical Books · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1983.tb00232.x · Cited by 57
The Self-Esteem of Children with Physical Disabilities—Problems and Dilemmas of Research
Llewellyn, A., & Chung, M. C. (1997) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1023/a:1024942205961 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- GARDNER H., 1985, The Minds New Science
- JOHNSTON M., 1994, The Psychologist, 205
- OLIVER M., 1995, Reach Journal of Special Needs Education in Ireland, 8, 67
- SAMEROFF A.J., 1991, Becoming a Person
- 1980, International classification of impairment, disease and handicap. A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science
Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13534 · Cited by 744
“The conventional medical paradigm, also known as the medical model of disability (Llewellyn & Hogan, 2000; Marks, 1997), approaches autism as a disability primarily rooted within individuals.”
BackgroundPhysical Activity Patterns in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Pan, C., & Frey, G. C. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0101-6 · Cited by 303
A Social Constructionist Approach to Disability: Implications for Special Education
Anastasiou, D., & Kauffman, J. M. (2011) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440291107700307 · Cited by 241
Law, J., Reilly, S., & Snow, P. C. (2013) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12027 · Cited by 189
Berghs, M. J., Atkin, K. M., Graham, H. M., Hatton, C., & Thomas, C. (2016) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr04080 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Llewellyn, A., & Hogan, K.
- ORCID
- Hogan, K.
- Venue
- Disability & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-165
- ISSN
- 0267-4645 (ISSN-L)
- 0968-7599
- 1360-0508
- OpenAlex
- W2004659298
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 21.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Disability & Society (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Keywords
- models of disability, medical model of disability, social model of disability, transactional model, systems theory, developmental psychology, children with physical disabilities, disability research, clinical practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
