The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Just because you can get a wheelchair in the building doesn't necessarily mean that you can still participate’: barriers to the career advancement of disabled professionals
Abstract
Despite governmental efforts and organizational initiatives, the number of disabled professionals in full‐time employment is small, and the number of those occupying leadership positions remains even smaller. Past research into disability and employment has outlined a range of barriers that disabled people face in seeking and maintaining employment. Yet, not enough is known about the challenges they encounter in top ranking appointments. This article extends Ryan's and Haslam's notion of the glass cliff to help explain the precariousness experienced by a group of disabled employees in leadership positions – focusing on the nature of the positions they hold and the difficulties they encounter as they attempt to advance their careers. Using qualitative interview data the analysis draws attention to problems associated with lack of opportunity, lack of resources and lack of support. It also point to ways of making workplace cultures and organizational practices more supportive of diversity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“both employers (Kaye et al., 2011) and employees with disabilities (Wilson-Kovacs, Ryan, Haslam, & Rabinovich, 2008) report employers’ lack of disability-related knowledge, which has implications for their behavior”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Wilson-Kovacs et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“It has been suggested that even if people with disabilities eventually make it into applicant pools, hiring managers might incorrectly assume that these applicants do not want challenging careers or assignments”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Wilson-Kovacs et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“Indeed, many employers acknowledge that they lack the necessary training at all stages of the employment relationship (Kaye et al., 2011; Wilson-Kovacs et al., 2008).”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Wilson-Kovacs et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, managers often report knowledge gaps on accommodation best practices and understanding of the disability experience (Kaye et al., 2011; Wilson-Kovacs et al., 2008).”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Wilson-Kovacs et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, employees with disabilities report that legal action occurs typically after other attempts at receiving reasonable accommodation have failed and that legal actions are a result of a lack of organizational-level knowledge on how to best support the careers of people with disabilities (Wilson-Kovacs et al., 2008).”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Wilson-Kovacs et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
(2017) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n168 · Cited by 8,268
Men and Women of the Corporation.
Strauss, G., & Kanter, R. M. (1978) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522922 · Cited by 7,292
Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001 · Cited by 5,478
Oliver, M. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1 · Cited by 4,227
The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over‐Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationDisabling Barriers-Enabling Environments
Shakespeare, T. (1994) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599466780121 · Cited by 976
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351856 · Cited by 938
Self-citationWomen and minorities in management.
Morrison, A. M., & Glinow, M. A. V. (1990) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.2.200 · Cited by 880
A Model of Factors Affecting the Treatment of Disabled Individuals in Organizations
Stone, D. L., & Colella, A. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060216 · Cited by 760
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Glaser B.G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory
- Mowry R.L., 1993, The Volta Review, 95, 367
- Prime Minister's Strategy Unit, 2005, Improving the life chances of disabled people
- Ryan M.K., 2007, The glass cliff: Precariousness beyond the glass ceiling, a CIPD Executive Briefing
- 10.2307/258666 · DOI · Paper page
- Stuart N., 2002, How employers and service providers are responding to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5 · Cited by 491
Why Don’t Employers Hire and Retain Workers with Disabilities?
Kaye, H. S., Jans, L. H., & Jones, E. C. (2011) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9302-8 · Cited by 484
Morgenroth, T., Kirby, T. A., Ryan, M. K., & Sudkämper, A. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000234 · Cited by 169
Self-citationWhite, G. W., Simpson, J. L., Gonda, C., Ravesloot, C., & Coble, Z. (2010) · Journal of Disability Policy Studies · doi:10.1177/1044207309350561 · Cited by 129
Jans, L. H., Kaye, H. S., & Jones, E. C. (2012) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9336-y · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson‐Kovacs, D., Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Rabinovich, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson‐Kovacs, Dana
- Venue
- Disability & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 705-717
- ISSN
- 0267-4645 (ISSN-L)
- 0968-7599
- 1360-0508
- OpenAlex
- W2081121618
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Disability & Society (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Social Fund
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- career development, glass cliff, leadership roles, disability and employment, workplace barriers, organizational culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
