The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Model of Factors Affecting the Treatment of Disabled Individuals in Organizations
Abstract
A model of factors thought to affect the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations is presented. Specifically, the model suggests that person characteristics (e.g., attributes of the disabled person, attributes of the observer), environmental factors (i.e., legislation), and organizational characteristics (e.g., norms, values, policies, the nature of jobs, reward systems) combine to affect the way disabled individuals are treated in organizations. Furthermore, the model indicates that the relationships just noted are mediated by observers' cognitions (i.e., categorization, stereotyping, expectancies) and affective states. Finally, the model predicts that the disabled person's responses feed back to modify observers' expectancies and organizational characteristics. Implications for conducting research on disability issues and facilitating the inclusion of disabled individuals in organizational settings are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To locate source material for our analyses, we conducted cited reference searches of key empirical papers documenting employers’ pessimistic views (Kaye et al., 2011; Lengnick-Hall et al., 2008) and a classic review paper (Stone & Colella, 1996) pertaining to workers with disabilities.”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Stone & Colella, 1996
In the citing paper
“An often noted concern of employers surrounds the job performance of workers with disabilities; employees with disabilities are presumed to be less productive than employees without disabilities (Lengnick-Hall et al., 2008; Stone & Colella, 1996; see also Domzal et al., 2008; Fredeen et al., 2013).”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Stone & Colella, 1996
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
(1969) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.45.527.642 · Cited by 14,255
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 11,176
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.
Seeman, M. S., & Goffman, E. (1964) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091442 · Cited by 10,716
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
Academy of Management Executive
(2010) · The Academy of Management executive/Academy of Management executive · doi:10.5465/ame · Cited by 9,051
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5 · Cited by 491
Is Disability Disabling in All Workplaces? Workplace Disparities and Corporate Culture
SCHUR, L., KRUSE, D., BLASI, J., & BLANCK, P. (2009) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.1468-232x.2009.00565.x · Cited by 354
Overlooked and underutilized: People with disabilities are an untapped human resource
Lengnick‐Hall, M. L., Gaunt, P. M., & Kulkarni, M. (2008) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20211 · Cited by 301
Corporate culture and the employment of persons with disabilities
Schur, L., Kruse, D., & Blanck, P. (2005) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.624 · Cited by 297
Accommodating Employees With and Without Disabilities
Schur, L., Nishii, L., Adya, M., Kruse, D., Bruyère, S. M., & Blanck, P. (2014) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21607 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, D. L., & Colella, A.
- Affiliations
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 352
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020400561
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 37.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Keywords
- people with disabilities, person characteristics, environmental factors, organizational characteristics, legislation, organizational values and norms, reward systems, job characteristics, categorization, stereotyping, expectancy, affective states, disability inclusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
