Cited by 264Disability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

The lived experience of students with an invisible disability at a Canadian university

Mullins, Laura, Preyde, Michèle·2013·Disability & Society

Abstract

University institutions are required by law to make their services accessible to students with disabilities. Canadian universities have gone a long way to eliminate the physical obstacles that present barriers for students. Many students with disabilities have invisible disabilities that require different types of adjustments. Although some researchers have evaluated the needs of students with disabilities in higher education, the unique needs of students with invisible disabilities have received less attention. The best means of assessing these needs is through direct consultation with students with disabilities. Thus, in-depth interviews were conducted with university students with dyslexia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and mental illness. Themes were developed that related to the nature of the disability, the accessibility of the university context, the social and organizational barriers, and recommendations for change. This research lends insight into how individuals with invisible disabilities believe that they are perceived within the university context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09687599.2012.752127

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disclosure can be emotionally tricky for students with disabilities.

    “As disclosure can be emotionally tricky for students with disabilities (Moriña, 2017;Mullins & Preyde, 2013;Osborne, 2019), this issue must be addressed carefully.”
  • Common barriers to full inclusion mentioned by students in higher education include negative faculty attitudes, stigma, college stressors, quality and accessibility of disability support services, inaccessible course design and digital materials, finances, and balancing academic and social lives.

    “In the HE context, common barriers to full inclusion that have been mentioned by students include negative faculty attitudes [50, 76, 85, 103], stigma [112], college stressors [50], the quality and accessibility of disability support services [50, 78], inaccessible course design and digital materials [78, 102], fi nances [109], and balancing academic and social lives [59, 75, 78].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mullins, L., & Preyde, M.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Preyde, Michèle
Venue
Disability & Society
Published
2013-01-15
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
147-160
ISSN
  • 0267-4645 (ISSN-L)
  • 0968-7599
  • 1360-0508
OpenAlex
W1978480558
Cited by
264
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
29.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Disability & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
invisible disabilities, university students, higher education accessibility, dyslexia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, mental illness, student needs, social barriers, organizational barriers, student perceptions, accommodation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review