Cited by 45Disability Education and EmploymentHigher Education and EmployabilityInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Inclusion at university, transition to employment and employability of graduates with disabilities: a systematic review

Open access
Moriña, Anabel, Biagiotti, Gilda·2022·International Journal of Educational Development

Abstract

This systematic review explores what has been studied about graduates with disabilities and their academic university and work experience. In the study, 18 articles were analysed and the voices of a total of 664 graduates with disabilities from different international contexts were considered. The results were organised around the research questions that guided the review: the characteristics of the studies in terms of country, participant profile, methodology, and the topics investigated on graduates and higher education (university inclusion, transition to employment and labour market insertion). This systematic review shows that there are a number of factors that enable graduates to continue and successfully complete their studies and facilitate their integration into the world of work. The conclusions show the important role that universities play in helping graduates to face the barriers they encounter in their academic careers. Furthermore, they claim to guide and prepare graduates with disabilities during their professional experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102647

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Investment in transition support programmes into and out of university can impact retention of, and graduate outcomes for, neurodivergent students.

    “Finally, investment in transition support programmes into and out of university can impact retention of, and graduate outcomes for, neurodivergent students (Moriño and Biagiotti, 2022).”

    From Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Moriño and Biagiotti, 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moriña, A., & Biagiotti, G.
Affiliations
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Corresponding author
Moriña, Anabel
Venue
International Journal of Educational Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
93
Pages
102647
ISSN
0738-0593 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285585673
Cited by
45
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Commission (PID2020-112761RB-100)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
university inclusion, school-to-work transition, employability, labour market integration, higher education, disability, work experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review