Cited by 21Disability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and RepresentationDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Disability Barriers in Academia: An Analysis of Disability Accommodation Policies for Faculty at Canadian Universities

Open access
Saltes, Natasha·2020·Canadian Journal of Disability Studies

Abstract

This article examines disability accommodation policies for faculty at 42 Canadian universities. Although universities in Canada are legally required to accommodate disabled employees, fewer than half of all universities have a written disability accommodation policy available. The search for disability accommodation policies revealed that there is a lack of consistency in policy implementation as well as language and content. The analysis revealed that disability accommodation policies contain overtly medical language and provisions that work to isolate disabled faculty by reinforcing the notion of competency as able-bodiedness and emphasizing the entanglement between disability, health and medicine. This article encourages universities to acknowledge their role in establishing accessible and inclusive workplaces and concludes with recommendations aimed at addressing some of the gaps and inconsistencies in disability accommodation policies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15353/cjds.v9i1.596

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AODA provides little direct guidance and compliance mechanisms for universities to adopt consistently.

    “Despite being a proactive measure, the AODA provides little direct guidance and compliance mechanisms for universities to adopt consistently [47].”

    From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [47]

    In “Disability Legislation in Canada” (p. 58), Saltes describes the AODA as proactive and says anti-discrimination legislation lacks practical guidance for drafting and implementing policies, leading to inconsistent responses to accommodation requests. The passage does not specifically say that the AODA lacks compliance mechanisms; it also notes that Ontario universities have begun adhering to its standards. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Brock University. (2016). Employment accommodation policy. Retrieved from https://brocku.ca/policies/wp-content/uploads/sites/94/Employment- AccommodationPolicy.pdf Canadian Association of University Teachers. (2001). Universities must act on accommodation issues. Retrieved from https://bulletin-archives.caut.ca/bulletin/articles/2001/09/universities-must-act-on- accommodation-issues
  2. Davis, L. J. (Ed.). (2018). Beginning with disability: A Primer. New York: Routledge
  3. DePoy, E., & Gilson, S. (2014). Branding and designing disability: Reconceptualizing disability studies. New York: Routledge
  4. Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saltes, N.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Saltes, Natasha
Venue
Canadian Journal of Disability Studies
Published
2020-02-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
53-90
ISSN
1929-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110743406
Cited by
21
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
Canadian Journal of Disability Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
higher education accessibility, medical model of disability, workplace inclusion, policy implementation, Canadian universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review