The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The democratization of finance? Promises, outcomes and conditions
Abstract
This paper analyses the ‘democratization of finance’ or the promise that all households can make money and/or manage risk by buying appropriate financial services products. It does so by exploring the reasons for discrepancy between what is promised and what can be delivered. Our analysis starts from the economic promises and political pitches for the democratization of finance since the early 1990s and the corollary emphasis on promoting mass financial literacy. The article then identifies three key social preconditions which must be satisfied before the promise is delivered. Evidence and argument from the UK and US suggests that these conditions are not met because the context is confusing, individuals lack calculative competence and products are opaque. Under these conditions felicitous outcomes are uncertain for existing middle class savers and very unlikely for lower income groups. A concluding section relates this analysis to the cultural economy literature and to the politics of social security versus individual responsibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2019) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.109.612 · Cited by 10,902
Corsaro, W. A., & Bourdieu, P. (1992) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579985 · Cited by 9,964
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
(1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477 · Cited by 8,240
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,657
Judgment under uncertainty: List of contributors
Kahneman, D. J., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Cited by 4,670
Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution
Kahneman, D. J., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Cited by 4,670
Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity
Mitchell, T. (2002) · doi:10.1525/9780520928251 · Cited by 3,693
Theory of the Consumption Function
Friedman, M. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9780691188485 · Cited by 3,335
Buchanan, I., Bourdieu, P., Raymond, G., & Adamson, M. (1993) · SubStance · doi:10.2307/3685295 · Cited by 3,018
The financialization of the American economy
Krippner, G. R. (2005) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwi008 · Cited by 2,533
Cited by
The Capitalization of Almost Everything: The Future of Finance and Capitalism
Leyshon, A., & Thrift, N. (2007) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276407084699 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Erturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., & Williams, K.
- Venue
- Review of International Political Economy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-08-14
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 553-575
- ISSN
- 0969-2290 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4526
- OpenAlex
- W2045483295
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 19.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The democratization of finance? Promises, outcomes and conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09692290701475312
- The paper
- Erturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., & Williams, K. (2007). The democratization of finance? Promises, outcomes and conditions. Review of International Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701475312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.