The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-organizing maps for multi-scale morphometric feature identification using shuttle radar topography mission data
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The spatial resolution of the digital model might not be related to the scale of the morphometric features intended to identify, so a multi-resolution size window is needed instead of a single one.
“The spatial resolution of the digital model might not be related to the scale of the morphometric features that we intend to identify, so there is the need to apply a multi-resolution size window instead of a single one (Ehsani and Quiel 2009: 337).”
From Entendiendo la movilidad humana mediante tecnologías espaciales: el papel de las áreas naturales de tránsito en el Suroeste de la Península Ibérica durante la Prehistoria Reciente (2012) · cites this paper as Ehsani and Quiel 2009: 337
The characteristics observed of a determined point or area of the surface vary when the calculation of the feature is performed with different spatial resolution or spatial extent.
“This means that the characteristics observed of determined point or area of the surface will vary when the calculation of the feature is performed with different spatial resolution or spatial extent (Ehsani and Quiel 2009: 336).”
From Entendiendo la movilidad humana mediante tecnologías espaciales: el papel de las áreas naturales de tránsito en el Suroeste de la Península Ibérica durante la Prehistoria Reciente (2012) · cites this paper as Ehsani and Quiel 2009: 336
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1016/j.geomorph.2003.07.024 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00063-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00139-X · DOI
- 10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00011-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1080/13658810600894364 · DOI
- Deng Y., 2007, Terrain analysis. The handbook of geographic information science
- Dikau R., 1989, Three dimensional applications in geographical information systems, 51
- 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.10.002 · DOI
- Evans I. S., 2003, Concept sand modeling in geomorphology: international perspectives, 61
- Evans I. S., 1972, Spatial analysis in geomorphology, 17
- 10.1029/2003JF000113 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00117.x · DOI
- 10.1029/2002WR001426 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199807)23:7<581::AID-ESP863>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00064-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.031 · DOI
- Guth P. L., 2006, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 72, 269, 10.14358/PERS.72.3.269 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1964.tb00470.x · DOI
- 10.2136/sssaj2003.1810 · DOI
- Huisenga, J. 2005. “Impact of SRTM data on geospatial support to US Army operations In: Abstracts Volume, The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Data Validation and Applications Workshop”. Reston, VA Abstract, 43
- 10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00019-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.09.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jag.2005.01.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.017 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2004.00169.x · DOI
- Kohonen, T. 2001.Self organizing maps, 160–161. New York: Springer. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.015 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01014.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.03.001 · DOI
- Pike R. J., 2000, Progress in Physical Geography, 24, 1
- 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.02.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00124-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pocean.2003.07.006 · DOI
- 10.1080/01431169508954606 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00136-7 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004JE002269 · DOI
- 10.1109/LGRS.2005.848509 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.039 · DOI
- Tate N., 2001, Modelling scale in geographical information science, 35
- 10.1109/72.846731 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00057-3 · DOI
- Wood, J. 1996a. “The geomorphological characterization of digital elevation models”. 112–124. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Geography, University of Leicester: UK
- Wood J., 1996, Innovations in GIS 3: selected papers from the third national conference on GIS Research UK (GISUK), 163
- Wood, J. Visualization of scale dependencies in the surface models. 19th International Cartographic Association Annual Conference. Proceedings. Ottawa. Available from:http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/∼jwo/ica99[Accessed December 2006]
- Wood J., 2002, Virtual reality in geography, 163
- 10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Murrieta-Flores, P. (2012) · Trabajos de Prehistoria · doi:10.3989/tp.2012.12082 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Ehsani, A. H., & Quiel, F.
- Venue
- Geocarto International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 335-355
- ISSN
- 1010-6049
- 1752-0762
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
