Cited by 11Gender, Education, and Development IssuesGender Studies and Social IssuesWater Resource Management and Quality

Addressing girls’ challenges of water and sanitation in a rural schooling context in Swaziland.

Mbatha, Thabile·2011·Agenda

Abstract

The Briefing reports on a study that investigates the problems experienced by girls as a result of the lack of water and sanitation in two rural schools in Swaziland using a Gender and Development (GAD) feminist theory to understand the genderspecific challenges faced by girls. The rationale of the study is to determine the extent of girls’ access to education amid the daily problems they have and to understand how schools address the problems. Interviews were conducted with 16 participants comprising, 11 girls, aged between 14 and 17, plus five women including a deputy principal and a principal of the schools, who live in the same communities as the girls, about access to water and sanitation and its impact on girls’ school attendance. Findings of the study indicate that the state of water and sanitation in both schools was not satisfactory. Girls’ rights to health, equal opportunities in education and a decent life were violated as a result of the schools’ inability to access clean water and sanitation at school. A correlation between poor access to water and sanitation and girls’ school attendance was identified. Girls’ and boys’ participation in education was unequal as a result of the lack of access to water and sanitation and sexism when it came to who fetches water at school. The Briefing concludes that in a patriarchal society where men hold the power and make many of the decisions, girls’ and women's gender subordination is often not questioned, and access to water and sanitation is severely compromised due to the absence of women and girls’ participation. Gender equality can be enhanced by giving women voice and by putting them in positions of decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10130950.2011.575995

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mbatha, T.
Corresponding author
Mbatha, Thabile
Venue
Agenda
Published
2011-06
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
35-42
ISSN
  • 1013-0950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2158-978X
OpenAlex
W2224312737
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agenda (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
Keywords
women's education, rural schools, school attendance, gender inequality, patriarchy, gender subordination, water fetching, women's participation in decision-making, gender and development, Swaziland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review