The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Hedge Contracts on Bidding Behavior in a Competitive Electricity Market*
Abstract
A major concern in the design of wholesale electricity markets is the potential for the exercise of market power by generating unit owners. To better understand the determinants of generating unit owner market power and how it is exercised, this paper derives a model of bidding behavior in a competitive electricity market which incorporates various sources of uncertainty and the impact of the electricity generator's position in the financial hedge contract market on its expected profit-maximizing bidding behavior. The model is first used to characterize the profit-maximizing market price that a generator would like set by its bidding strategy for several hedge contract and spot sales combinations. This model is applied to bid and contract data obtained from the first three months of operation of the National Electricity Market (NEM1) in Australia. This analysis illustrates the sensitivity of expected profit-maximizing bidding strategies to the amount of financial hedge contracts held by the generating unit owner. It also provides strong evidence for the effectiveness of financial hedge contracts as a means to mitigate market power during the initial stages of operation of a wholesale electricity market. [L 94]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pass-Through of Emissions Costs in Electricity Markets
Fabra, N., & Reguant, M. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.9.2872 · Cited by 491
Hortaçsu, A., & Puller, S. L. (2008) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00005.x · Cited by 432
Pricing and Firm Conduct in California's Deregulated Electricity Market
Puller, S. L. (2007) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.89.1.75 · Cited by 255
Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market, 1998–2000
Wolak, F. A. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803321947461 · Cited by 254
Self-citationIncomplete Environmental Regulation, Imperfect Competition, and Emissions Leakage
Fowlie, M. L. (2009) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.1.2.72 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolak, F. A.
- Venue
- International Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-39
- ISSN
- 1016-8737 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-517X
- OpenAlex
- W2008156261
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Hedge Contracts on Bidding Behavior in a Competitive Electricity Market*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10168730000000017
- The paper
- Wolak, F. A. (2000). An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Hedge Contracts on Bidding Behavior in a Competitive Electricity Market*. International Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168730000000017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.