The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Use of Electrolysis for Accurate δ17O and δ18O Isotope Measurements in Water
Abstract
We present a new system to measure the relative isotopic abundances of both rare isotopes of oxygen in water. Using electrolysis with CuSO4 as electrolyte, water is transformed into oxygen gas. This gas is subsequently analyzed with a standard Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer. We investigated the features of the system in detail. The results for δ17O and δ18O are carefully calibrated against δ18O of VSMOW using our “conventional” H2O-CO2 equilibrium system. For the electrolysis system, we obtain an accuracy (including calibration) of 0.10‰ for δ18O, and 0.07‰ for δ17O. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness and accuracy of the system by analyzing a large set of natural waters (both fresh and salt waters). We establish the 17O and 18O relation to be of the type: 1 + δ17O = (1 + δ18O)λ, and find λ to be 0.5281 ± 0.0015. We conclude that the 17O fractionation in water appears to be completely analogous to that of 18O. Still, measurements concerning the equilibrium and kinetic fractionation of the evaporation process are needed. The new method is an excellent alternative to the traditional H2O-CO2 equilibrium method. Moreover, its capability to also measure 17O may be fruitfully exploited, e.g., in biomedical studies extending the doubly labelled water technique, or in studies of stratospheric water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Craig, H. (1957) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(57)90024-8 · Cited by 4,170
A Component of Primitive Nuclear Composition in Carbonaceous Meteorites
Clayton, R. N., Grossman, L., & Mayeda, T. K. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.182.4111.485 · Cited by 798
Use of Oxygen Isotope Effects in Study of Hydration of Ions
Taube, H. (1954) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j150517a003 · Cited by 134
Oxygen isotope fractionation in stratospheric CO2
Thiemens, M. H., Jackson, T., Mauersberger, K., Schueler, B., & Morton, J. (1991) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/91gl00121 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Referencing strategies and techniques in stable isotope ratio analysis
Werner, R. A., & Brand, W. A. (2001) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.258 · Cited by 1,033
Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality
Monks, P. S., Granier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M. L., Akimoto, H., Amann, M., Baklanov, A., Baltensperger, U., Bey, I., et al. (2009) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021 · Cited by 872
Böhlke, J. K., Mroczkowski, S. J., & Coplen, T. B. (2003) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.1123 · Cited by 465
Reporting 14C Activities and Concentrations
Mook, W. G., & van der Plicht, J. (1999) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200057106 · Cited by 456
Isotopic fractionation and the quantification of 17 O anomalies in the oxygen three-isotope system
Miller, M. F. (2002) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(02)00832-3 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Meijer, H. A. J., & Li, W. J.
- Venue
- Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-369
- ISSN
- 1025-6016 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2639
- OpenAlex
- W1775234348
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Electrolysis for Accurate δ17O and δ18O Isotope Measurements in Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10256019808234072
- The paper
- Meijer, H. A. J., & Li, W. J. (1998). The Use of Electrolysis for Accurate δ17O and δ18O Isotope Measurements in Water. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/10256019808234072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.