The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media
Abstract
This paper develops the concept of listening as a metaphor for paying attention online. Pejorative terms such as ‘lurking’ have failed to capture much detail about the experience of presence online. Instead, much online media research has focused on ‘having a voice’, be it in blogs, wikis, social media, or discussion lists. The metaphor of listening can offer a productive way to analyse the forms of online engagement that have previously been overlooked, while also allowing a deeper consideration of the emerging disciplines of online attention. Social media are the focus of this paper, and in particular, how these platforms are changing the configurations of the ideal listening subject. Three modes of online listening are discussed: background listening, reciprocal listening, and delegated listening; Twitter provides a case study for how these modes are experienced and performed by individuals, politicians and corporations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
Self-citationAffective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt
Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x · Cited by 803
Social Media in Disaster Risk Reduction and Crisis Management
Alexander, D. E. (2014) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9502-z · Cited by 616
Reinecke, L., Aufenanger, S., Beutel, M. E., Dreier, M., Quiring, O., Stark, B., Wölfling, K., & Müller, K. W. (2017) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832 · Cited by 387
Hargittai, E., & Shaw, A. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.957711 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Crawford, K.
- Venue
- Continuum
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-07-27
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525-535
- ISSN
- 1030-4312 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3666
- OpenAlex
- W2158003437
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10304310903003270
- The paper
- Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903003270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.