Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt
Abstract
This study traces the rhythms of news storytelling on Twitter via the #egypt hashtag. Using computational discourse analysis, we examine news values and the form of news exhibited in #egypt from January 25 to February 25, 2011, pre- and post-resignation of Hosni Mubarak. Results point to a hybridity of old and newer news values, with emphasis on the drama of instantaneity, the crowdsourcing of elites, solidarity, and ambience. The resulting stream of news combines news, opinion, and emotion to the point where discerning one from the other is difficult and doing so misses the point. We offer a theory of affective news to explain the distinctive character of content produced by networked publics in times of political crisis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Networked publics' fusing of activist discourse with traditional news narratives results in an 'affective' flow of information that can speak to the common experiences, concerns, and sympathies of larger publics.
“In particular, networked publics' fusing of activist discourse with traditional news narratives results in an 'affective' flow of information that can speak to the common experiences, concerns, and sympathies of larger publics.”
From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira (2012)
Such flows of information provide a form of emotional release that simultaneously invigorates and exhausts tension in times of social crisis.
“Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira contend that such flows of information 'provide a form of emotional release that simultaneously invigorates and exhausts tension' in times of social crisis (p.280).”
From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira (2012)
Twitter can provide a continuous stream of information from the perspective of those closest to crisis events.
“Unlike traditional modes of news reporting and information sharing, they argue, Twitter can provide a continuous stream of information from the perspective of those closest to crisis events.”
From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira (2012)
Social media in general, and Twitter in particular, have enormous capacity to elevate and sustain counterpublic voices and refocus the attention of the mainstream public sphere.
“While much of so-called 'activism' online is quite inactive in terms of sustained social change, recent work illustrates the enormous capacity for social media in general, and Twitter in particular, to elevate and sustain counterpublic voices and refocus the attention of the mainstream public sphere (Hamdy & Gomaa, 2012;Lewis, Gray, & Meierhenrich, 2014;Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012).”
From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012
Crowdsourced elites are a hodgepodge of actors who became prominent network influencers because of how their storytelling during the Egyptian revolution resonated with their networks and the resulting reply and retweet networks, elevating regular citizens to the same status as more traditional information sources.
“They identify crowdsourced elites as a hodgepodge of actors who became prominent network influencers because of how their storytelling during the Egyptian revolution resonated with their networks and the resulting reply and retweet networks -elevating regular citizens to the same status as more traditional information sources.”
From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira (2012)
Our findings support other works on the potential of public interest to outweigh state interest in setting agendas and creating the terms for debate.
“Our findings support other works on the potential of public interest to outweigh state interest in setting agendas and creating the terms for debate (Benkler et al., 2013;Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012).”
From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012
Cites
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652 · see citing works
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/002234336500200104 · Cited by 3,428 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W., & García-Albacete, G. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.948035 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
#Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks
Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2016) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1106571 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Sustained online amplification of COVID-19 elites in the United States
Gallagher, R. J., Doroshenko, L., Shugars, S., Lazer, D., & Foucault Welles, B. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211024957 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Castillo-de-Mesa, J., Méndez-Domínguez, P., Carbonero-Muñoz, D., & Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2021) · Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales · doi:10.5565/rev/redes.913 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Adriaansen, R.-J. (2024) · Memory, Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2024.7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Papacharissi, Zizi
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-02-23
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 266-282
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122572908
- Cited by
- 803
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 163.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Queensland University of Technology
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Discourse and Social Analysis
- Keywords
- Twitter, news storytelling, news values, instantaneity, crowdsourcing, solidarity, ambience, political crisis, networked publics, Egyptian revolution, emotions in news
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review