Cited by 803Media Studies and CommunicationJournalism and Media StudiesMedia Discourse and Social Analysis

Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt

Papacharissi, Zizi, de Fatima Oliveira, Maria·2012·Journal of Communication

Abstract

This study traces the rhythms of news storytelling on Twitter via the #egypt hashtag. Using computational discourse analysis, we examine news values and the form of news exhibited in #egypt from January 25 to February 25, 2011, pre- and post-resignation of Hosni Mubarak. Results point to a hybridity of old and newer news values, with emphasis on the drama of instantaneity, the crowdsourcing of elites, solidarity, and ambience. The resulting stream of news combines news, opinion, and emotion to the point where discerning one from the other is difficult and doing so misses the point. We offer a theory of affective news to explain the distinctive character of content produced by networked publics in times of political crisis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Networked publics' fusing of activist discourse with traditional news narratives results in an 'affective' flow of information that can speak to the common experiences, concerns, and sympathies of larger publics.

    “In particular, networked publics' fusing of activist discourse with traditional news narratives results in an 'affective' flow of information that can speak to the common experiences, concerns, and sympathies of larger publics.”

    From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira (2012)

  • Such flows of information provide a form of emotional release that simultaneously invigorates and exhausts tension in times of social crisis.

    “Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira contend that such flows of information 'provide a form of emotional release that simultaneously invigorates and exhausts tension' in times of social crisis (p.280).”

    From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira (2012)

  • Twitter can provide a continuous stream of information from the perspective of those closest to crisis events.

    “Unlike traditional modes of news reporting and information sharing, they argue, Twitter can provide a continuous stream of information from the perspective of those closest to crisis events.”

    From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira (2012)

  • Social media in general, and Twitter in particular, have enormous capacity to elevate and sustain counterpublic voices and refocus the attention of the mainstream public sphere.

    “While much of so-called 'activism' online is quite inactive in terms of sustained social change, recent work illustrates the enormous capacity for social media in general, and Twitter in particular, to elevate and sustain counterpublic voices and refocus the attention of the mainstream public sphere (Hamdy & Gomaa, 2012;Lewis, Gray, & Meierhenrich, 2014;Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012).”

    From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012

  • Crowdsourced elites are a hodgepodge of actors who became prominent network influencers because of how their storytelling during the Egyptian revolution resonated with their networks and the resulting reply and retweet networks, elevating regular citizens to the same status as more traditional information sources.

    “They identify crowdsourced elites as a hodgepodge of actors who became prominent network influencers because of how their storytelling during the Egyptian revolution resonated with their networks and the resulting reply and retweet networks -elevating regular citizens to the same status as more traditional information sources.”

    From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Papacharissi and de Fatima Oliveira (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2012-02-23
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
266-282
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122572908
Cited by
803
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 4
FWCI
163.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Funders
Queensland University of Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Discourse and Social Analysis
Keywords
Twitter, news storytelling, news values, instantaneity, crowdsourcing, solidarity, ambience, political crisis, networked publics, Egyptian revolution, emotions in news

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review