CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 138Gender, Feminism, and MediaGender, Education, and Development IssuesFeminism, Gender, and Intersectionality

‘Confidence You Can Carry!’: Girls in Crisis and the Market for Girls' Empowerment Organizations

Banet-Weiser, Sarah·2015·Continuum
DOI 10.1080/10304312.2015.1022938
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Girl empowerment organizations (GEOs) emerged in the USA around the same time that empowering girls became a central theme in international development discourse. I argue that these organizations are part of a ‘market of empowerment’ that aims to empower girls within a context of commodified girl power and neoliberal entrepreneurialism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10304312.2015.1022938

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Today we must attend to the syncretic soldering of the fascist 'crisis-woman' to the neoliberal 'at-risk' woman and even to particular varietals of liberal feminism.

    “the same”

    From Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as Banet-Weiser 2015

  • The tradition of critique of liberal feminism, coterminous with white feminism, has always insisted on offering a clear-eyed account of its use-value for the ends of white supremacy.

    “The tradition of critique of liberal feminism, which is these days more or less coterminous with what is referred to as”

    From Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Banet-Weiser, S.
Affiliations
, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Venue
Continuum
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2015-03-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
182-193
ISSN
  • 1030-4312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3666
DOI
10.1080/10304312.2015.1022938
OpenAlex
W2013277072
Cited by
138
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
27.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Continuum (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
Keywords
international development discourse, girls' empowerment, nonprofit organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review