Cited by 115Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsInnovations in Medical Education

A Peer-Support and Mindfulness Program to Improve the Mental Health of Medical Students

Moir, Fiona, Henning, Marcus, Hassed, Craig, Moyes, Simon A., Elley, C. Raina·2016·Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Abstract

PROBLEM: There is evidence that peer-support programs can improve mental health indices and help-seeking behavior among students in some secondary school and university settings and that mindfulness can improve mental health in medical students. Peer-led programs have not been formally assessed in a medical student population, where psychological issues exist and where it has been shown that students approach peers for help in preference to staff members or professional services. INTERVENTION: Medical students elected peer leaders who underwent training and then provided the intervention. The peer leaders provided support to students in the intervention group, as well as offering teaching in mindfulness meditation. CONTEXT: An exploratory study was conducted with 2nd- and 3rd-year medical students at 1 medical school in New Zealand randomized into 2 groups. In addition to existing mental health resources, intervention participants received a program including peer support and peer-taught mindfulness practice. Study participants not offered the intervention participants could use existing mental health resources. Primary measures included depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) scores. Secondary measures were quality of life, resilience (15-item resilience scale), academic self-concept, and motivation to learn, assessed at baseline and 6 months. OUTCOME: Of the 402 students eligible, 275 (68%) participated and 232 (58%) completed the study. At baseline, 53% were female and mean age was 21 years (SD = 3)-PHQ-9 score (M = 5.2, SD = 3.7) and GAD-7 score (M = 4.5, SD = 3.4). Twelve peer leaders were elected. There was good participation in the intervention. One fourth of intervention students used the face-to-face peer support and more than 50% attended a peer social event and/or participated in the mindfulness program. Although improvements in mental health were seen in the intervention group, the difference between the intervention and nonintervention groups did not reach statistical significance. LESSONS LEARNED: Although evidence exists for effectiveness of peer support and mindfulness in other contexts, this exploratory study was not able to show a statistically significant effect. Future studies could consider using a longer training period for the peer leaders, as well as targeting the study population to those most likely to benefit such as those with poorer mental health, or using a more intensive intervention or larger sample size. A cluster randomized study design would also reduce the risk of contamination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10401334.2016.1153475

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moir, F., Henning, M., Hassed, C., Moyes, S. A., & Elley, C. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Moir, Fiona
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2016-04-19
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
293-302
ISSN
  • 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8015
OpenAlex
W2341673554
Cited by
115
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Auckland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
peer support, mindfulness meditation, medical students, student mental health, depression, anxiety, peer leaders, resilience, academic self-concept, help-seeking, quality of life
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Motivation, New Zealand, Peer Group, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Students, Medical, Meditation, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review