Cited by 249Microbial Inactivation MethodsUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

Opportunities and Challenges in Application of Ultrasound in Food Processing

Rastogi, Navin K.·2011·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

The demand for convenience foods of the highest quality in terms of natural flavor and taste, and which are free from additives and preservatives, has spurred the need for the development of a number of non-thermal approaches to food processing, of which ultrasound technology has proven to be very valuable. Increasing number of recent publications have demonstrated the potential of this technology in food processing. A combination of ultrasound with pressure and/or heat is a promising alternative for the rapid inactivation of microorganisms and enzymes. Therefore, novel techniques like thermosonication, manosonication, and manothermosonication may be a more relevant energy-efficient processing alternative for the food industry in times to come. This review aims at identifying the opportunities and challenges associated with this technology. In addition to discussing the effects of ultrasound on foods, this review covers various areas that have been identified as having great potential for future development. It has been realized that ultrasound has much to offer to the food industry such as inactivation of microorganisms and enzymes, crystallization, drying, degassing, extraction, filtration, homogenization, meat tenderization, oxidation, sterilization, etc., including efficiency enhancement of various operations and online detection of contaminants in foods. Selected practical examples in the food industry have been presented and discussed. A brief account of the challenges in adopting this technology for industrial development has also been included.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408391003770583

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining ultrasound with other processing technologies, particularly thermal treatments, has demonstrated promise and potential in enhancing microbiological safety while maintaining the quality of food products.

    “Combining ultrasound with other processing technologies, particularly thermal treatments, has demonstrated promise and potential in enhancing microbiological safety while maintaining the quality of food products [93].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rastogi, N. K.
Affiliations
Central Food Technological Research Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Rastogi, Navin K.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2011-09
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
705-722
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W2020939051
Cited by
249
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Keywords
ultrasound, non-thermal food processing, thermosonication, microbial inactivation, enzyme inactivation, food drying, degassing, extraction, homogenization, meat tenderization, oxidation, sterilization, contamination detection, energy efficiency, industrial adoption
MeSH terms
Food Contamination, Food Handling, Food Preservation, Hot Temperature, Osmosis, Pressure, Sonication, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review