The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rosemary and Cancer Prevention: Preclinical Perspectives
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in Australia. Nutrition, particularly intake of vegetables and certain plant components, has been reported to have a major role in cancer risk reduction. Recently, there has been a growing research interest in rosemary, a common household plant grown in many parts of the world. This study aims to review scientific evidence from all studies, published from 1996 to March 2010 that examined the protective effects of rosemary on colorectal cancer and other types of cancer. Literature evidence from animal and cell culture studies demonstrates the anticancer potential of rosemary extract, carnosol, carnosic acid, ursolic acid, and rosmarinic acid. No evidence for other rosemary constituents was found. The reported anticancer properties were found to arise through the molecular changes in the multiple-stage process of cancer development, which are dose related and not tissue or species specific. This is evidenced by the ability of rosemary to suppress the development of tumors in several organs including the colon, breast, liver, stomach, as well as melanoma and leukemia cells. The results suggested that the different molecular targets modulated by rosemary and its active constituents are useful indicators of success in clinical cancer chemo-prevention trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Offord, E. A., Gautier, J.-C., Avanti, O., Scaletta, C., Runge, F., Krämer, K., & Applegate, L. A. (2002) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(02)00831-6 · Cited by 254
Cited by
The role and place of medicinal plants in the strategies for disease prevention
Sofowora, A., Ogunbodede, E., & Onayade, A. (2013) · African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines · doi:10.4314/ajtcam.v10i5.2 · Cited by 1,014
Rašković, A., Milanović, I., Pavlović, N., Ćebović, T., Vukmirović, S., & Mikov, M. (2014) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-225 · Cited by 470
Review of Natural Compounds for Potential Skin Cancer Treatment
Chinembiri, T., Du Plessis, L., Gerber, M., Hamman, J., & Du Plessis, J. (2014) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules190811679 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Ngo, S. N. T., Williams, D. B., & Head, R. J.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 946-954
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W2069126054
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rosemary and Cancer Prevention: Preclinical Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408398.2010.490883
- The paper
- Ngo, S. N. T., Williams, D. B., & Head, R. J. (2011). Rosemary and Cancer Prevention: Preclinical Perspectives. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.490883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.