The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants*
Abstract
This article provides a science-based, decision tree approach to assess the allergenic concerns associated with the introduction of gene products into new plant varieties. The assessment focuses on the source from which the transferred gene was derived. Sources fall into three general categories: common allergenic food proteins; less common allergenic foods or other known allergen sources; and sources with no history of allergenicity. Information concerning the amino acid sequence identity to known allergenic proteins, in vitro and/or in vivo immunologic assays, and assessment of key physiochemical properties are included in reaching a recommendation on whether food derived from the genetically modified plant variety should be labeled as to the source of the transferred gene. In the end, a balanced judgement of all the available data generated during allergenicity assessment will assure the safety of foods derived from genetically engineered crops. Using the approaches described here, new plant varieties generated by genetic modification should be introduced into the marketplace with the same confidence that new plant varieties developed by traditional breeding have been introduced for decades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
Cited by
Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma
Bousquet, J., van Cauwenberge, P., & Khaltaev, N. (2001) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1067/mai.2001.118891 · Cited by 3,588
Panel), E. P. O. G. M. O. (. (2010) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1700 · Cited by 608
Methods of in vitro toxicology
Eisenbrand, G., Pool-Zobel, B., Baker, V, Balls, M., Blaauboer, B. J., Boobis, A., Carere, A., Kevekordes, S., Lhuguenot, J.-C., Pieters, R., et al. (2002) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00118-1 · Cited by 462
Fu, T.-J., Abbott, U. R., & Hatzos, C. (2002) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf020599h · Cited by 403
Taylor, S. L. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf030375e · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Metcalfe, D. D., Astwood, J. D., Townsend, R., Sampson, H. A., Taylor, S. L., & Fuchs, R. L.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- sup001
- Pages
- 165-186
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W1974078294
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408399609527763
- The paper
- Metcalfe, D. D., Astwood, J. D., Townsend, R., Sampson, H. A., Taylor, S. L., & Fuchs, R. L. (1996). Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants*. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399609527763
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.