The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probiotics in shrimp aquaculture: Avenues and challenges
Abstract
As an alternative strategy to antibiotic use in aquatic disease management, probiotics have recently attracted extensive attention in aquaculture. However, the use of terrestrial bacterial species as probiotics for aquaculture has had limited success, as bacterial strain characteristics are dependent upon the environment in which they thrive. Therefore, isolating potential probiotic bacteria from the marine environment in which they grow optimally is a better approach. Bacteria that have been used successfully as probiotics belong to the genus Vibrio and Bacillus, and the species Thalassobacter utilis. Most researchers have isolated these probiotic strains from shrimp culture water, or from the intestine of different penaeid species. The use of probiotic bacteria, based on the principle of competitive exclusion, and the use of immunostimulants are two of the most promising preventive methods developed in the fight against diseases during the last few years. It also noticed that probiotic bacteria could produce some digestive enzymes, which might improve the digestion of shrimp, thus enhancing the ability of stress resistance and health of the shrimp. However, the probiotics in aquatic environment remain to be a controversial concept, as there was no authentic evidence / real environment demonstrations on the successful use of probiotics and their mechanisms of action in vivo. The present review highlights the potential sources of probiotics, mechanism of action, diversity of probiotic microbes and challenges of probiotic usage in shrimp aquaculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probiotic bacteria: Selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods
Shah, N. P. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74953-8 · Cited by 1,010
Probiotics in marine larviculture
Vine, N. G., Leukes, W. D., & Kaiser, H. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00017.x · Cited by 436
Vibrios Associated with Litopenaeus vannamei Larvae, Postlarvae, Broodstock, and Hatchery Probionts
Vandenberghe, J., Verdonck, L., Robles-Arozarena, R., Rivera, G., Bolland, A., Balladares, M., Gomez-Gil, B., Calderon, J., Sorgeloos, P., & Swings, J. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.6.2592-2597.1999 · Cited by 203
Cited by
The contribution of aquaculture systems to global aquaculture production
Verdegem, M., Buschmann, A. H., Latt, U. W., Dalsgaard, A. J. T., & Lovatelli, A. (2023) · Journal of the World Aquaculture Society · doi:10.1111/jwas.12963 · Cited by 322
Cornejo-Granados, F., Lopez-Zavala, A. A., Gallardo-Becerra, L., Mendoza-Vargas, A., Sánchez, F., Vichido, R., Brieba, L. G., Viana, M. T., Sotelo-Mundo, R. R., & Ochoa-Leyva, A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11805-w · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Ninawe, A. S., & Selvin, J.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-66
- ISSN
- 1040-841X (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7828
- OpenAlex
- W2138972464
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probiotics in shrimp aquaculture: Avenues and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408410802667202
- The paper
- Ninawe, A. S., & Selvin, J. (2009). Probiotics in shrimp aquaculture: Avenues and challenges. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408410802667202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.