The DOI matches its Crossref record; 189 of the 189 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aspartame: A Safety Evaluation Based on Current Use Levels, Regulations, and Toxicological and Epidemiological Studies
Abstract
Aspartame is a methyl ester of a dipeptide used as a synthetic nonnutritive sweetener in over 90 countries worldwide in over 6000 products. The purpose of this investigation was to review the scientific literature on the absorption and metabolism, the current consumption levels worldwide, the toxicology, and recent epidemiological studies on aspartame. Current use levels of aspartame, even by high users in special subgroups, remains well below the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Food Safety Authority established acceptable daily intake levels of 50 and 40 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. Consumption of large doses of aspartame in a single bolus dose will have an effect on some biochemical parameters, including plasma amino acid levels and brain neurotransmitter levels. The rise in plasma levels of phenylalanine and aspartic acid following administration of aspartame at doses less than or equal to 50 mg/kg bw do not exceed those observed postprandially. Acute, subacute and chronic toxicity studies with aspartame, and its decomposition products, conducted in mice, rats, hamsters and dogs have consistently found no adverse effect of aspartame with doses up to at least 4000 mg/kg bw/day. Critical review of all carcinogenicity studies conducted on aspartame found no credible evidence that aspartame is carcinogenic. The data from the extensive investigations into the possibility of neurotoxic effects of aspartame, in general, do not support the hypothesis that aspartame in the human diet will affect nervous system function, learning or behavior. Epidemiological studies on aspartame include several case-control studies and one well-conducted prospective epidemiological study with a large cohort, in which the consumption of aspartame was measured. The studies provide no evidence to support an association between aspartame and cancer in any tissue. The weight of existing evidence is that aspartame is safe at current levels of consumption as a nonnutritive sweetener.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals: Eighth Edition
(2011) · doi:10.17226/12910 · Cited by 16,199
Bowman, P. W. (1963) · AIBS Bulletin · doi:10.2307/1292957 · Cited by 3,638
Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients
Rowe, R. C., Sheskey, P. J., & Quinn, M. E. (1994) · Cited by 3,493
Indian Journal of Experimental Biology
(2022) · Indian Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.56042/ijeb · Cited by 3,392
Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons
(1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-5-448_2 · Cited by 3,302
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
(2010) · Wilderness & Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2010.09.015 · Cited by 2,950
Budavari, S. (1998) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · Cited by 2,741
International Journal of Obesity
(2019) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/41366.1476-5497 · Cited by 2,078
Brain Lesions, Obesity, and Other Disturbances in Mice Treated with Monosodium Glutamate
Olney, J. W. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.164.3880.719 · Cited by 1,804
Role of the INK4a Locus in Tumor Suppression and Cell Mortality
Serrano, M., Lee, H.-W., Chin, L., Cordon-Cardo, C., Beach, D., & DePinho, R. A. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81079-x · Cited by 1,585
Cited by
Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota
Suez, J., Korem, T., Zeevi, D., Zilberman-Schapira, G., Thaiss, C. A., Maza, O., Israeli, D., Zmora, N., Gilad, S., Weinberger, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13793 · Cited by 2,067
Mattes, R. D., & Popkin, B. M. (2009) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26792 · Cited by 521
Effects of Sweeteners on the Gut Microbiota: A Review of Experimental Studies and Clinical Trials
Ruiz-Ojeda, F. J., Plaza-Díaz, J., Sáez-Lara, M. J., & Gil, A. (2019) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmy037 · Cited by 426
Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners
Fitch, C., & Keim, K. S. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.009 · Cited by 373
Sweetened beverages, coffee, and tea and depression risk among older US adults
Guo, X., Park, Y., Freedman, N. D., Sinha, R., Hollenbeck, A. R., Blair, A., & Chen, H. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094715 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Magnuson, B. A., Burdock, G. A., Doull, J., Kroes, R. M., Marsh, G. M., Pariza, M. W., Spencer, P. S., Waddell, W. J., Walker, R., & Williams, G. M.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Toxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 629-727
- ISSN
- 0045-6446 (ISSN-L)
- 1040-8444
- 1547-6898
- OpenAlex
- W2130284699
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 189
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspartame: A Safety Evaluation Based on Current Use Levels, Regulations, and Toxicological and Epidemiological Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408440701516184
- The paper
- Magnuson, B. A., Burdock, G. A., Doull, J., Kroes, R. M., Marsh, G. M., Pariza, M. W., Spencer, P. S., Waddell, W. J., Walker, R., & Williams, G. M. (2007). Aspartame: A Safety Evaluation Based on Current Use Levels, Regulations, and Toxicological and Epidemiological Studies. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440701516184
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.