Cited by 112Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMedia Influence and HealthSocial Media in Health Education

Media Use and Health Information Seeking: An Empirical Test of Complementarity Theory

Tian, Yan, Robinson, James D.·2008·Health Communication

Abstract

This study compares cancer victims and cancer-free adults' use of communication channels for health information. It tests the complementarity theory (Dutta-Bergman, 2004a, 2004b) with a subsample of the Health Information National Trends Survey data. The complementarity of communication channels for health information use is confirmed on 3 different levels: complementarity among mass media channels, including traditional media and the Internet; complementarity between the interpersonal channel and mass media channels; and complementarity between the interpersonal channel and mass media channels after controlling for illness severity. This study provides strong support for complementarity theory, and extends the complementarity hypothesis into the realm of interpersonal channels of communication. Finally, this investigation suggests cancer victims use the media for health information differently than adults who have not been diagnosed with cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10410230801968260

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Tian, Y., & Robinson, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
  • University of Dayton (US)
Corresponding author
Tian, Yan
Venue
Health Communication
Published
2008-04-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
184-190
ISSN
  • 1041-0236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7027
OpenAlex
W2080346920
Cited by
112
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
complementarity principle, health information seeking, cancer patients, mass media use, interpersonal communication, traditional media, internet use, disease severity, communication channels, Health Information National Trends Survey
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Media, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Internet, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review