Cited by 41Health disparities and outcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchLatin American and Latino Studies

Family connections and the Latino health paradox: exploring the mediating role of loneliness in the relationships between the Latina/o cultural value of familism and health

Gallegos, Monica L., Segrin, Chris·2022·Health Communication

Abstract

This study aims to understand Latina/o health from a social relationships perspective. Specifically, a major goal of the study is to explain how despite disadvantages (e.g., lower income and less education), Latinas/os in some cases have superior health compared to non-Latina/o whites, a phenomenon known as the Latino Health Paradox. Based on the central role of familial relationships in Latina/o culture, and utilizing Hawkley and Cacioppo’s theoretical model of loneliness and health as a foundation for the study, the premise underlying this research is that the Latina/o cultural value of familism has a beneficial impact on health via reduced loneliness. Participants were 255 adults who identified as Latina/o (N = 139) or non-Latina/o white (N = 116), ranging in age from 19–88. Results indicate that being Latina/o predicted strong endorsement of familism, that predicted lower loneliness, and lower loneliness subsequently predicted better overall health, mental health, and health practices. These results suggest that the cultural value of familism provides health-related benefits for Latinas/os, which contributes to understanding the Latino health paradox. Results also underscore the value of including loneliness in studies examining the impact of cultural values on health, as only loneliness had statistically significant direct associations with all three health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10410236.2021.1909244

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has identified the family as a particularly important source of health-related support among Latinos, including for HIV care.

    “Research has also identified the family as a particularly important source of health-related support among Latinos (Diaz & Niño, 2019;Gallegos & Segrin, 2021;Velasco-Mondragon, Jimenez, Palladino-Davis, Davis, & Escamilla-Cejuda, 2016), including for HIV care”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallegos, M. L., & Segrin, C.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Northridge (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Gallegos, Monica L.
Venue
Health Communication
Published
2021-04-15
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
1204-1214
ISSN
  • 1041-0236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7027
OpenAlex
W3154615106
Cited by
41
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ford Foundation (Funding not specific to the study (broad use))
  • University of Arizona (SBSRI Summer Dissertation Completion Fellowship)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Latin American and Latino Studies
Keywords
familism, loneliness, family relationships, interpersonal relationships, mental health, health practices
MeSH terms
Adult, Family Relations, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Loneliness, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review