Cited by 9Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareEmpathy and Medical EducationPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Exploring Patients’ Trust from a New Perspective. A Text-Analysis Study

Colombo, Barbara, Aurelio, Benjamin, Wallace, H. James, Heath, Jessica L.·2023·Health Communication

Abstract

The concept of trust has been extensively studied within the field of medicine. Yet, a list of factors that clearly influence patients' trust is still under debate. Moreover, the methodological approaches found in literature have been reported to be lacking in their assessments and measurements of trust relationships in the medical field although trust between a patient and medical provider has been proven to increase adherence and improve health outcomes. Hence, adding data to this debate and exploring a reliable method to explore the construct of trust is relevant. This study collects new evidence of the most salient indicators of patient trust by using a narrative approach and highlighting the potential of this method in collecting indicators that could be used to build training that aims to increase patients' trust. We used the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software for text analysis to examine the spontaneous narrations of episodes of trust and distrust within the doctor-patient relationship with a sample of 82 adult patients. Results demonstrate the role of the emotional aspects of the doctor-patient relationship. Data highlights the importance of doctors' benevolence toward patients, and positive emotions seem to be deeply connected with any experience of trust, which leads patients to feel more secure. Methods are presented to use these insights to construct mechanisms that establish medical trust and allow providers to implement effective interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10410236.2022.2131973

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients' past negative experiences can hinder patient-provider communication and impair trust-building, making patients hesitate to engage in collaborative care.

    “Patients’ past negative experiences can hinder patient-provider communication and impair trust-building, making patients hesitate to engage in collaborative care [64,65].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colombo, B., Aurelio, B., Wallace, H. J., & Heath, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Champlain College (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Colombo, Barbara
Venue
Health Communication
Published
2022-10-10
Volume
38
Issue
13
Pages
3040-3050
ISSN
  • 1041-0236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7027
OpenAlex
W4304014792
Cited by
9
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
funding associated
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
patient trust, physician-patient relationship, trust indicators, benevolence, patient narratives, positive emotions, patient-provider communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Emotions, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Narration, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review