Cited by 808Mental Health via WritingPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Linguistic Markers of Psychological Change Surrounding September 11, 2001

Cohn, Michael A., Mehl, Matthias R., Pennebaker, James W.·2004·Psychological Science

Abstract

The diaries of 1,084 U.S. users of an on-line journaling service were downloaded for a period of 4 months spanning the 2 months prior to and after the September 11 attacks. Linguistic analyses of the journal entries revealed pronounced psychological changes in response to the attacks. In the short term, participants expressed more negative emotions, were more cognitively and socially engaged, and wrote with greater psychological distance. After 2 weeks, their moods and social referencing returned to baseline, and their use of cognitive-analytic words dropped below baseline. Over the next 6 weeks, social referencing decreased, and psychological distancing remained elevated relative to baseline. Although the effects were generally stronger for individuals highly preoccupied with September 11, even participants who hardly wrote about the events showed comparable language changes. This study bypasses many of the methodological obstacles of trauma research and provides a finegrained analysis of the time line of human coping with upheaval.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00741.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psycholinguistic expressions that signal an individual's underlying psychological state are associated with non-content words, which are rarely consciously regulated.

    “Moreover, psycholinguistic expressions that signal an individual ' s underlying psychological state, are associated with non-content words, such as articles and pronouns, which are rarely consciously regulated by the individual and may span a variety of topics directly or indirectly related to a crisis, whether of fl ine (Cohn et al., 2004) or online (Saha and De Choudhury, 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2004-10
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
687-693
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2145610967
Cited by
808
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 41
FWCI
19.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH052391, MH52391)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
September 11 attacks, online journaling, psychological change, emotional expression, social referencing, psychological distancing, coping with trauma
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Cognition, Female, Humans, Linguistics, Male, Terrorism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review