Cited by 379Sport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsSports and Physical Education Research

Self-Regulation Differences during Athletic Practice by Experts, Non-Experts, and Novices

Cleary, Timothy J., Zimmerman, Barry J.·2001·Journal of Applied Sport Psychology

Abstract

Basketball experts, non-experts, and novices were studied for differences in their self-regulatory forethought and self-reflection processes regarding their free-throw shooting. Forty-three adolescent boys participated individually in the study, which involved a practice session in a gymnasium. The subjects were queried regarding their forethought goals, strategy choice, self-efficacy as well as their self-reflection attributions and feelings of satisfaction as they practiced their shooting. Among the significant results, experts set more specific goals, selected more technique-oriented strategies, made more strategy attributions, and displayed higher levels of self-efficacy than non-experts and novices. Forethought phase processes intercorrelated significantly as did self-reflection phase processes. In addition, self-reflection attributions were predictive of forethought strategy selection during further efforts to learn. The results were discussed in terms of a social cognitive model of self-regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/104132001753149883

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cleary and Zimmerman (2001) studied the SRL skills showed by adolescent boys who were experts, non-experts and novices in basketball, finding that experts performed more SRL actions.

    “First, Cleary and Zimmerman (2001) studied the SRL skills showed by adolescent boys who were experts, non-experts and novices in basketball, finding that experts performed more SRL actions.”

    From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Cleary and Zimmerman (2001)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J.
Affiliations
City University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
Published
2001-03
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
185-206
ISSN
  • 1041-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1571
OpenAlex
W2113666542
Cited by
379
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
self-regulation, forethought, self-reflection, expertise differences, novice-expert continuum, goal specificity, strategy selection, self-efficacy, satisfaction, social cognitive model, youth athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review