The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Manipulated Self-Efficacy on Perceived and Sustained Effort
Abstract
Self-efficacy's role in determining perceived and sustained effort during an isometric handgrip task was assessed using a repeated measures experimental design. Moderately active, predominantly Caucasian, participants (male = 33, female = 39, M = 19.18 years, SD = .74) were recruited from the southeastern United States. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: High-efficacy (HE), low-efficacy (LE), or control. Efficacy expectations were manipulated via false performance feedback. During the task participants provided differentiated ratings of perceived effort at 15-s intervals. Effort tolerance was determined by the length of time the participant could maintain the task. Repeated measures (RM) multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated the HE group found the task less strenuous and more enjoyable than the LE or control group. Furthermore, the HE group demonstrated greater tolerance of the task than either the LE or control group. These findings imply that self-efficacy has a major role in enhancing performance and physical effort tolerance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A study by Hutchinson, Sherman, Martinovic, and Tenenbaum (2008) showed greater tolerance for sustained effort in a continuous force production task, increased self-efficacy, and lower perceived exertion as a function of positive normative feedback compared with both negative feedback and control conditions.”
From Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning (2016) · cites this paper as Hutchinson, Sherman, Martinovic, and Tenenbaum (2008)
In the citing paper
“For example, expectancies can influence performance through proactive effects on effort expenditure (Fiorio, Andani, Marotta, Classen, & Tinazzi, 2014;Hutchinson et al., 2008) and on perception (Abrams & Weidler, 2015;Chauvel et al., 2015;Piedimonte, Benedetti & Carlino, 2015;Witt, South, & Sugovic, 2014).”
From Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning (2016) · cites this paper as Hutchinson et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“Heightened expectations result from performance accomplishments (Bandura, 1977), but expectations have also been experimentally and prospectively linked to motor performance (Feltz, Chow, & Hepler, 2008;Hutchinson et al., 2008;Moritz et al., 2000;Neiss, 1989;Wulf et al., 2012).”
From Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning (2016) · cites this paper as Hutchinson et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“Task enjoyment (Hutchinson et al., 2008) and positive affect as assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) also have been related to conditions that enhance expectancies (Stoate et al., 2012).”
From Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning (2016) · cites this paper as Hutchinson et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Pain mechanisms: a new theory.
Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3699.971 · Cited by 11,108
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
Bandura, A. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446221129.n6 · Cited by 9,948
Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning
Bandura, A. (1993) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3 · Cited by 7,655
Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies
(1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511527692 · Cited by 4,190 · cited 8×
“Self-efficacy is the “belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments” (Bandura, 1997, p. 3).”
BackgroundInfluentialHealth promotion from the perspective of Social Cognitive Theory
Bandura, A. (1998) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870449808407422 · Cited by 3,087
Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition, and Human Performance
McArdle, W. D., Katch, F. I., & Katch, V. L. (2006) · Cited by 2,633
Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies
Bandura, A., & Watts, R. (1996) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.10.4.313 · Cited by 1,937
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Harter S., 1990, Perceptions of competence and incompetence across the life-span, 67
- McAuley E., 2000, Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 28, 85
- Noble B. J., 1996, Perceived exertion
- Turk D. C., 1983, Pain and behavioral medicine: A cognitive-behavioral approach
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9 · Cited by 1,238
Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors
Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x · Cited by 898
Video Games and Rehabilitation
Lohse, K. R., Shirzad, N., Verster, A., Hodges, N. J., & der Loos, H. F. M. V. (2013) · Neurology Report · doi:10.1097/npt.0000000000000017 · Cited by 339
The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation
Winn, M. B., Edwards, J., & Litovsky, R. Y. (2015) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000145 · Cited by 283
Lauren, N., Fielding, K. S., Smith, L. D. G., & Louis, W. R. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.10.004 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutchinson, J. C., Sherman, T., Martinovic, N., & Tenenbaum, G.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Florida State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-10-29
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 457-472
- ISSN
- 1041-3200 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-1571
- OpenAlex
- W2148713704
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- self-efficacy, perceived exertion, sustained effort, effort tolerance, isometric handgrip, task enjoyment, physical performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
