Cited by 215Sport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Manipulated Self-Efficacy on Perceived and Sustained Effort

Hutchinson, Jasmin C., Sherman, Todd, Martinovic, Nevena, Tenenbaum, Gershon·2008·Journal of Applied Sport Psychology

Abstract

Self-efficacy's role in determining perceived and sustained effort during an isometric handgrip task was assessed using a repeated measures experimental design. Moderately active, predominantly Caucasian, participants (male = 33, female = 39, M = 19.18 years, SD = .74) were recruited from the southeastern United States. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: High-efficacy (HE), low-efficacy (LE), or control. Efficacy expectations were manipulated via false performance feedback. During the task participants provided differentiated ratings of perceived effort at 15-s intervals. Effort tolerance was determined by the length of time the participant could maintain the task. Repeated measures (RM) multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated the HE group found the task less strenuous and more enjoyable than the LE or control group. Furthermore, the HE group demonstrated greater tolerance of the task than either the LE or control group. These findings imply that self-efficacy has a major role in enhancing performance and physical effort tolerance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10413200802351151

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Harter S., 1990, Perceptions of competence and incompetence across the life-span, 67
  2. McAuley E., 2000, Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 28, 85
  3. Noble B. J., 1996, Perceived exertion
  4. Turk D. C., 1983, Pain and behavioral medicine: A cognitive-behavioral approach

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hutchinson, J. C., Sherman, T., Martinovic, N., & Tenenbaum, G.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
Published
2008-10-29
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
457-472
ISSN
  • 1041-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1571
OpenAlex
W2148713704
Cited by
215
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
self-efficacy, perceived exertion, sustained effort, effort tolerance, isometric handgrip, task enjoyment, physical performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review