CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 206Sport Psychology and PerformanceStress and Burnout ResearchSociology, History and Politics of Sport

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stress in Elite Sports Coaching: Identifying Stressors

Olusoga, Peter, Butt, Joanne, Hays, Kate, Maynard, Ian·2009·Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
DOI 10.1080/10413200903222921
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper presents the first in a series of studies exploring coaches’ experiences of stress within the unique culture of world class sport. The purpose of this study was to gain an in-depth account of the stressors encountered by elite coaches in the United Kingdom. Six male and six female coaches with international experience were interviewed. Transcribed interviews were inductively content analyzed by three independent researchers. Ten higher-order themes emerged, demonstrating that coaches experienced a wide range of stressors (e.g., conflict, pressure and expectation, athlete concerns, competition preparation, isolation). Conflict within the organization emerged as a key theme, indicating that communication skills might be important in helping coaches function effectively as part of a wider organizational team. Findings also highlight the importance of psychological skills training for coaches to help them cope with the diverse demands of world class coaching.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10413200903222921

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Jones R. L., 2000, The sociology of sport: Theory and practice, 33
  2. Kroll W., 1982, Coaching Science Update, 23, 47
  3. Rainey D. W., 1999, Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 578
  4. Sullivan P. A., 1993, Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics Annual, 1
  5. Wang J., 1998, Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics, 13, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 204

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Olusoga, P., Butt, J., Hays, K., & Maynard, I.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
  • English Institute of Sport (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-10-27
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
442-459
ISSN
  • 1041-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1571
DOI
10.1080/10413200903222921
OpenAlex
W2062950746
Cited by
206
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology, History and Politics of Sport
Keywords
coach stress, stressors, organizational conflict, competition preparation, social isolation, communication skills, mental training, coping, coaching experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review