Cited by 47Sport Psychology and PerformancePsychological Treatments and AssessmentsSports Dynamics and Biomechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Influences of Skill Level, Anxiety, and Psychological Skills Use on Amateur Golfers’ Performances

Hayslip, Bert, Petrie, Trent A., MacIntire, Mae M., Jones, Gretchen M.·2010·Journal of Applied Sport Psychology

Abstract

The present study not only explored the influence of golf expertise on mental skills utilization, but also the influences of the use of mental skills and anxiety on performance at a major national golf competition. Participants, who had played golf for an average of 23 years, ranged in age (M = 52.17, SD = 11.81) and in skill level (M handicap = 15.58, SD = 6.41), included 1151 male and 173 female amateur golfers competing in the Dupont World Amateur Golf Championship in Myrtle Beach, SC. Measures targeted mental skills utilization, golf-specific skills, and competitive trait anxiety. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to examine the use of psychological skills across age (≤49, 50 and above) and levels of golf skill (Professional Golf Association certified handicaps, ≤11, 12–19, and ≥20), and based upon prospective longitudinal data, hierarchical regression analyses were used to determine those factors that predicted successful golf performance across all three rounds of the tournament. Not surprisingly, consistent differences in the use of psychological skills across skill level were found, favoring more skilled players. The most salient predictors of better tournament performance (lower gross scores) were automaticity, commitment to golf, and disruptions in concentration, whereas positive self-talk predicted higher scores. These findings reinforce the role of automaticity in fostering the experience of peak performance in a competitive sport context.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10413200903554281

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Catley D., 1997, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 309
  2. Hayslip B., Journal of Sport Behavior
  3. Marchant D. B., 1998, Journal of Sport Behavior, 21, 71
  4. McCaffrey N., 1989, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 20, 256
  5. McKay J., 1997, Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 29, 55
  6. Myers M. C., 1996, Journal of Sport Behavior, 19, 132
  7. Ntoumanis N., 1998, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 29, 99

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hayslip, B., Petrie, T. A., MacIntire, M. M., & Jones, G. M.
Affiliations
University of North Texas (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
Published
2010-04-30
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
123-133
ISSN
  • 1041-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1571
OpenAlex
W2169581830
Cited by
47
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
amateur golfers, golf performance, psychological skills, competitive anxiety, skill level, golf handicap, automaticity, positive self-talk, concentration disruption, peak performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review