Cited by 47Sport Psychology and PerformanceSocial Representations and IdentityPsychological Treatments and Assessments

On Investigating Self-Talk: A Descriptive Experience Sampling Study of Inner Experience During Golf Performance

Dickens, Yani L., Van Raalte, Judy, Hurlburt, Russell T.·2018·The Sport Psychologist

Abstract

Although self-talk has been shown to be an effective performance enhancement tool, accessing athletes’ ongoing inner experiences, including self-talk, has proven difficult. This study investigated the feasibility and desirability of using Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES) to sample athletes’ inner experiences during competition, thus avoiding potential distortions that arise from retrospective reports and questionnaires. Golfers ( N = 10) were trained as DES participants in their natural environments; then their experiences were sampled during a golf tournament. More self-talk occurred during tournament play than in natural environments. Self-talk was a frequent but not ubiquitous component of experience during tournament play, inner-speaking self-talk was six times as frequent as speaking aloud self-talk, and effortful System 2 self-talk was rare. The results of this research demonstrate that DES can be feasibly implemented in sport settings and may be a useful approach for researchers exploring athletes’ inner experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/tsp.2016-0073

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DES shows that covert self-talk (inner speech) in golfers is tenfold more frequent than overt self-talk and occurs more during tournaments.

    “DES shows that covert self-talk (IS) in golfers is tenfold more frequent than overt self-talk and occurs more during tournaments [20].”

    From Inner speech as language process and cognitive tool (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickens, Y. L., Van Raalte, J., & Hurlburt, R. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
  • 2Springfield College
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Dickens, Yani L.
Venue
The Sport Psychologist
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
66-73
ISSN
  • 0888-4781 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2793
OpenAlex
W2581297847
Cited by
47
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Sport Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
self-talk, descriptive experience sampling, inner experience, golf performance, tournament play, sport performance enhancement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review