The DOI matches its Crossref record.
University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention
Abstract
This paper is an attempt to quantify key aspects of innovations, ‘basicness’ and appropriability, and explore the linkages between them. We rely on detailed patent data. particularly on patent citations, thus awarding the proposed measures a very wide coverage. Relying on the prior that universities perform more basic research than corporations, we find that forward-looking measures of ‘importance’ and ‘generality’ capture aspects of the basicness of innovations. Similarly, measures of the degree of reliance on scientific sources. and of the closeness to the origins of innovational paths, appear to reflect the basicness of research. As measures of appropriability we use the fraction of citations coming from patents awarded to the sarne inventor, and in fact these measures are much higher for corporations than fbr universities. An examination of a small number of patents that are universally recognized as ‘basic’ provides further support for these measures. We find also evidence of the existence of ‘technologl trajectories’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers
Alcácer, J., & Chung, W. (2007) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0637 · Cited by 805
Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules
Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., Li, D., & Sampat, B. N. (2019) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdy034 · Cited by 349
The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK
Banal-Estañol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., & Lawson, C. (2015) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.006 · Cited by 205
The applied value of public investments in biomedical research
Li, D., Azoulay, P., & Sampat, B. N. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal0010 · Cited by 194
Dornbusch, F., & Neuhäusler, P. (2015) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.003 · Cited by 67
Academia-Industry Linkages for Sustainable Innovation in Agriculture Higher Education in India
Soam, S. K., Subbanna, Y. B., Rathore, S., Sumanth Kumar, V. V., Kumar, S., Vinayagam, S. S., Rakesh, S., Balasani, R., Raju, D. T., Kumar, A., et al. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su152316450 · Cited by 16
“Academia focuses more on basic sciences, whereas companies focus more on applied research with the goal of profit maximization [71].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A.
- Venue
- Economics of Innovation and New Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-50
- ISSN
- 1043-8599 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8364
- OpenAlex
- W1967629308
- Cited by
- 1,218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.