Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers
Abstract
Given the importance of proximity for knowledge spillovers, we examine firms’ location choices expecting differences in firms’ strategies. Firms will locate to maximize their net spillovers as a function of locations’ knowledge activity, their own capabilities, and competitors’ anticipated actions. Using new entrants into the United States from 1985 to 1994, we find that firms favor locations with academic innovative activity. Other results highlight differences in firms’ location strategies suggesting that firms consider not only gains from inward knowledge spillovers but also the possible cost of outward spillovers. While less technologically advanced firms favor locations with high levels of industrial innovative activity, technologically advanced firms choose only locations with high levels of academic activity and avoid locations with industrial activity to distance themselves from competitors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Catching-up and convergence have not been an inevitable consequence of market liberalization.
“Indeed, catching-up and convergence have not been an inevitable consequence of market liberalization 1 .”
From Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
Cites
(1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195076165.001.0001 · Cited by 3,069 · see citing works
Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905 · Cited by 2,565 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Location and the multinational enterprise
Cantwell, J. (2009) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2008.82 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Anand, J., McDermott, G., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2021) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-021-00426-1 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry
Narula, R., & Santangelo, G. D. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.005 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Ascani, A., Crescenzi, R., & Iammarino, S. (2016) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1080/00130095.2016.1179570 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alcácer, J., & Chung, W.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- ORCID
- Chung, Wilbur
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 760-776
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2117236007
- Cited by
- 805
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 45.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
- Keywords
- firm location decisions, knowledge spillovers, proximity, academic innovation, industrial innovation, organizational capabilities, technological progress, new entrants, location strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review