Cited by 205University-Industry-Government Innovation ModelsResearch, Science, and Academiascientometrics and bibliometrics research

The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK

Open access
Banal-Estañol, Albert, Jofre-Bonet, Mireia, Lawson, Cornelia·2015·Research Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.006

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collaboration among scientists in developing and developed countries helps their research results gain credibility and visibility, improves the quality of research, improves citations, and increases knowledge and technological transfer.

    “Collaborationamong scientistsindevelopinganddevelopedcountrieshelptheirresearchresultstogaincredibility andvisibility,improvethequalityofresearch(Osareh,2005),improvedcitations(Pohl,2020), increaseknowledgeandtechnologicaltransfer(Banal-Estañol etal. , 2015).”

    From A systematic literature review of lean manufacturing implementation in manufacturing-based sectors of the developing and developed countries (2022) · cites this paper as Banal-Estañol et al., 2015

    The Discussion and Conclusion (p. 28) says moderate university–industry collaboration facilitates knowledge transfer and accelerates the exploitation of new inventions. The citation is attached to the transfer claim, not the preceding claims about credibility, quality, or citations. The paper studies UK engineering academics collaborating with industry; it does not establish the same effect for collaborations among scientists in developing and developed countries. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Tuckmann, H.P. and J. Leahey, 1975. "What is an article worth", Journal of Political Economy 83, 951-968.
  2. Wooldridge, J.M., 2002, 'Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data', MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  3. Wooldridge, J.M., 2003, 'Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach', second edition, South Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banal-Estañol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., & Lawson, C.
Affiliations
Collegio Carlo Alberto (IT)
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1160-1175
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144683274
Cited by
205
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
30.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • European Commission (266588)
  • Cranfield University
  • Collegio Carlo Alberto
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
university-industry collaboration, research output, engineering academics, publication rates, industry partners, curvilinear relationship, academic careers, British universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review