The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Internet Skills
Abstract
Research that considers Internet skills often lacks theoretical justifications and does not go beyond basic button knowledge. There is a strong need for a measurement framework that can guide future research. In this article, operational definitions for measuring Internet skills are proposed, applied in two large-scale performance tests, and tested for reliability and validity. The framework consists of four Internet skills: operational, formal, information, and strategic Internet skills. The framework proves to be a powerful means for understanding the complexity of the Internet skills that people employ when they use the Internet. The reliability of the framework is supported by obtaining similar results from two studies focusing on different contexts. The validity of the framework is investigated by comparing the results with external standards that also provide an indication of Internet skill levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Norris, P. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164887 · Cited by 2,921
Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts
Bawden, D. (2001) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eum0000000007083 · Cited by 1,207
Information Seeking in Electronic Environments
Marchionini, G. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626388 · Cited by 833
Experiments in Digital Literacy
Alkali, Y. E., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421 · Cited by 364
Internet Usage by Low-Literacy Adults Seeking Health Information: An Observational Analysis
Birru, M. S., Monaco, V. M., Charles, L., Drew, H., Njie, V., Bierria, T., Detlefsen, E., & Steinman, R. A. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e25 · Cited by 220 · cited 1×
“This problem is reinforced by the fact that information seekers often do not venture past the first page of search results (e.g., Aula & Nordhausen, 2006; Birru et al., 2004; Hargittai, 2003).”
Background
Cited by
The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010 · Cited by 2,006
Self-citationScheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007 · Cited by 1,471
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019900176 · Cited by 927
“Van Deursen and Van Dijk (2010) showed that similar determinants of internet access and use determine internet skills; however, the relative influence of these determinants depends on the type of skill measured.”
Backgroundvan der Vaart, R., van Deursen, A. J., Drossaert, C. H., Taal, E., van Dijk, J. A., & van de Laar, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1840 · Cited by 404
Swart, J. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211008828 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Deursen, A. J. A. M. V., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-09-17
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 891-916
- ISSN
- 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7590
- OpenAlex
- W1970502738
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 28.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
