Cited by 364Digital literacy in educationLiteracy, Media, and EducationLibrary Science and Information Literacy

Experiments in Digital Literacy

Alkali, Yoram Eshet, Amichai-Hamburger, Yair·2004·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

Having digital literacy requires more than just the ability to use software or to operate a digital device; it includes a large variety of complex skills such as cognitive, motoric, sociological, and emotional that users need to have in order to use digital environments effectively. A conceptual model that was recently described by the authors suggests that digital literacy comprises five major digital skills: photo-visual skills ("reading" instructions from graphical displays), reproduction skills (utilizing digital reproduction to create new, meaningful materials from preexisting ones), branching skills (constructing knowledge from non-linear, hypertextual navigation), information skills (evaluating the quality and validity of information), and socio-emotional skills (understanding the "rules" that prevail in cyberspace and applying this understanding in online cyberspace communication). The present paper presents results from a performance-based pioneer study that investigated the application of the above digital literacy skills conceptual model among different groups of scholars. Results clearly indicate that the younger participants performed better than the older ones, with photo-visual and branching literacy tasks, whereas the older participants were found to be more literate in reproduction and information literacy tasks. Research results shed light on the cognitive skills that users utilize in performing with digital environments, and provide educators and software developers with helpful guidelines for designing better user-centered digital environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alkali, Y. E., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y.
Affiliations
  • Open University, Tel Hai Academic College, Higher Galilee, Israel.
  • Bar-Ilan University Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2004-08
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
421-429
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W1964894031
Cited by
364
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
digital literacy, digital skills, information literacy, socioemotional skills, age differences, cognitive skills, user-centered design, hypertext navigation, online communication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Cognition, Communication, Computer Graphics, Computer Literacy, Concept Formation, Creativity, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Problem Solving, Software, User-Computer Interface, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review