Cited by 830Gender and Technology in EducationInnovative Human-Technology InteractionTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale

Franke, Thomas, Attig, Christiane, Wessel, Daniel·2019·International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

DOI 10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Successful coping with technology is relevant for mastering daily life. Based on related conceptions, we propose affinity for technology interaction (ATI), defined as the tendency to actively engage in intensive technology interaction, as a key personal resource for coping with technology. We present the 9-item ATI scale, an economical unidimensional scale that assesses ATI as an interaction style rooted in the construct need for cognition (NFC). Results of multiple studies (n > 1500) showed that the scale achieves good to excellent reliability, exhibits expected moderate to high correlations with geekism, technology enthusiasm, NFC, self-reported success in technical problem-solving and technical system learning success, and also with usage of technical systems. Further, correlations of ATI with the Big Five personality dimensions were weak at most. Based on the results, the ATI scale appears to be a promising tool for research applications such as the characterization of user diversity in system usability tests and the construction of general models of user-technology interaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis
Horn, J. L. (1965) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289447 · Cited by 8,965
A power primer.
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x · Cited by 6,835
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,483
“The Need for Cognition.”
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 · Cited by 4,244 · cited 5×
“The 10-item BFI-10 (Rammstedt & John, 2007) was used to assess the Big Five personality dimensions openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (Attig & Franke, 2017).”
MethodInfluential
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428104263675 · Cited by 3,104
eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World.
Norman, C. D., & Skinner, H. A. (2006) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9 · Cited by 2,643
Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 · Cited by 2,517 · cited 3×
“NFC denotes that individuals differ regarding their tendency to engage in cognitive activities (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982; Cacioppo, Petty, Feinstein, & Jarvis, 1996).”
Background

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

Beier G., 1999, Report Psychologie, 9, 684
Bless H., 1994, Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147
10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
Karp, A. (2017). Untersuchung von Zusammenhängen zwischen Nutzungsmotivationen und Interaktionen mit Fitnessarmbändern [Examining relationships between usage motives and interactions with fitness trackers] (Bachelor’s thesis). Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Karrer K., 2009, Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme. 8. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme 7. bis 9. Oktober 2009, 196
Keil, J. (2015). Exploring individual differences in the tendency to fall for the active user paradox (Bachelor’s thesis). University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands.
Pieritz, S. (2017). Die Wirkung positiver vs. negativer Feedbackdarstellungen im Kontext von Gamification [The effect of positive vs. negative feedback presentations in the context of gamification] (Bachelor’s thesis). Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Schwarze, D. (2017). Framing-effect and eco-driving: The impact on driving behaviour through different portrayals of eco-indicators (Bachelor’s thesis). Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Stöhr, W. (2015). Exploring people’s resistance to the active user paradox including personality traits (Bachelor’s thesis). University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands.
10.1504/IJTM.1996.025468 · DOI

Sorted by citations

Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements
Beiderbeck, D., Frevel, N., von der Gracht, H. A., Schmidt, S. L., & Schweitzer, V. M. (2021) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2021.101401 · Cited by 642
Trust and reliance on AI — An experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on AI
Klingbeil, A., Grützner, C., & Schreck, P. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108352 · Cited by 450
Unearthing the determinants of Blockchain adoption in supply chain management
Wong, L., Tan, G. W., Lee, V., Ooi, K., & Sohal, A. S. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1730463 · Cited by 440
Abandonment of personal quantification: A review and empirical study investigating reasons for wearable activity tracking attrition
Attig, C., & Franke, T. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.025 · Cited by 187
Self-citation
Barriers to and Facilitators for Using Nutrition Apps: Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework
König, L. M., Attig, C., Franke, T., & Renner, B. (2021) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/20037 · Cited by 164
Self-citation
What does the public think about artificial intelligence?—A criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI
Brauner, P., Hick, A., Philipsen, R., & Ziefle, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903 · Cited by 143
Situational Trust Scale for Automated Driving (STS-AD): Development and Initial Validation
Holthausen, B. E., Wintersberger, P., Walker, B. N., & Riener, A. (2020) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3409120.3410637 · Cited by 138
I track, therefore I walk – Exploring the motivational costs of wearing activity trackers in actual users
Attig, C., & Franke, T. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.04.007 · Cited by 126
Self-citation
Evaluating privacy, security, and trust perceptions in conversational AI: A systematic review
Leschanowsky, A., Rech, S., Popp, B., & Bäckström, T. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108344 · Cited by 155
Influence of Hand Tracking as a Way of Interaction in Virtual Reality on User Experience
Voigt‐Antons, J., Kojić, T., Ali, D., & Möller, S. (2020) · International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex48832.2020.9123085 · Cited by 111
Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication
Ghorbani Lyastani, S., Schilling, M., Neumayr, M., Backes, M., & Bugiel, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp40000.2020.00047 · Cited by 128
What to expect from opening up ‘black boxes’? Comparing perceptions of justice between human and automated agents
Schlicker, N., Langer, M., Ötting, S. K., Baum, K., König, C. J., & Wallach, D. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106837 · Cited by 106
Investigating AI Teammate Communication Strategies and Their Impact in Human-AI Teams for Effective Teamwork
Zhang, R., Duan, W., Flathmann, C., McNeese, N. J., Freeman, G., & Williams, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610072 · Cited by 134
Impact of Anthropomorphic Robot Design on Trust and Attention in Industrial Human-Robot Interaction
Onnasch, L., & Hildebrandt, C. L. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3472224 · Cited by 114
Knowing About Knowing: An Illusion of Human Competence Can Hinder Appropriate Reliance on AI Systems
He, G., Kuiper, L., & Gadiraju, U. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581025 · Cited by 107
“The covariates’ distribution is as follows: ATI (𝑀 = 3.73, 𝑆𝐷 = 0.99, 6-point Likert scale, and 1: low, 6: 6https://github.com/RichardHGL/CHI2023_DKE high), TiA-Propensity to Trust (𝑀 = 2.95, 𝑆𝐷 = 0.60, 5-point Likert scale, 1: tend to distrust, 5: tend to trust).”
MethodInfluential
ATI-S - An Ultra-Short Scale for Assessing Affinity for Technology Interaction in User Studies
Wessel, D., Attig, C., & Franke, T. (2019) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3340764.3340766 · Cited by 99
Self-citation
What’s Driving Me? Exploration and Validation of a Hierarchical Personality Model for Trust in Automated Driving
Kraus, J., Scholz, D. D., & Baumann, M. R. K. (2020) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820922653 · Cited by 107
Users’ Preferences for Smart Home Automation – Investigating Aspects of Privacy and Trust
Schomakers, E.-M., Biermann, H., & Ziefle, M. (2021) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2021.101689 · Cited by 105
Promises and trust in human–robot interaction
Cominelli, L., Feri, F., Garofalo, R., Giannetti, C., Meléndez-Jímenez, M. A., Greco, A., Nardelli, M., Scilingo, E. P., & Kirchkamp, O. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88622-9 · Cited by 91
The Role of Privacy in the Acceptance of Smart Technologies: Applying the Privacy Calculus to Technology Acceptance
Schomakers, E.-M., Lidynia, C., & Ziefle, M. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1994211 · Cited by 94
Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis
Weik, L., Fehring, L., Mortsiefer, A., & Meister, S. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01049-0 · Cited by 96
Appearance is not everything - Preferred feature combinations for care robots
Klüber, K., & Onnasch, L. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107128 · Cited by 84
Teleoperation of Highly Automated Vehicles in Public Transport: User-Centered Design of a Human-Machine Interface for Remote-Operation and Its Expert Usability Evaluation
Kettwich, C., Schrank, A., & Oehl, M. (2021) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti5050026 · Cited by 86
The Nudge Puzzle
Zimmermann, V., & Renaud, K. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3429888 · Cited by 88
The future of e-commerce? Understanding livestreaming commerce continuance usage
Chong, H. X., Hashim, A. H., Osman, S., Lau, J. L., & Aw, E. C. (2022) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/ijrdm-01-2022-0007 · Cited by 90
Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability
Yurrita, M., Draws, T., Balayn, A., Murray-Rust, D., Tintarev, N., & Bozzon, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581161 · Cited by 108
Is the uptake, engagement, and effectiveness of exclusively mobile interventions for the promotion of weight‐related behaviors equal for all? A systematic review
Szinay, D., Forbes, C. C., Busse, H., DeSmet, A., Smit, E. S., & König, L. M. (2023) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13542 · Cited by 76
A Wizard of Oz Field Study to Understand Non-Driving-Related Activities, Trust, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicles
Detjen, H., Pfleging, B., & Schneegaß, S. (2020) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3409120.3410662 · Cited by 80
Second Chance for a First Impression? Trust Development in Intelligent System Interaction
Tolmeijer, S., Gadiraju, U., Ghantasala, R., Gupta, A., & Bernstein, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization · doi:10.1145/3450613.3456817 · Cited by 67
Capable but Amoral? Comparing AI and Human Expert Collaboration in Ethical Decision Making
Tolmeijer, S., Christen, M., Kandul, S., Kneer, M., & Bernstein, A. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517732 · Cited by 70
The impact of human-AI collaboration types on consumer evaluation and usage intention: a perspective of responsibility attribution
Yue, B., & Li, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277861 · Cited by 72
Teleoperation of industrial robot manipulators based on augmented reality
Solanes, J. E., Muñoz, A., Gracia, L., Testón, A. M., Girbés-Juan, V., & Tornero, J. (2020) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-020-05997-1 · Cited by 66
Why or Why Not? The Effect of Justification Styles on Chatbot Recommendations
Wilkinson, D., Alkan, Ö., Liao, Q. V., Mattetti, M., Vejsbjerg, I., Knijnenburg, B. P., & Daly, E. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3441715 · Cited by 67
Check the box! How to deal with automation bias in AI-based personnel selection
Kupfer, C., Prassl, R., Fleiß, J., Malin, C., Thalmann, S., & Kubicek, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118723 · Cited by 59
“Technical affinity was measured with the Affinity for Technology Interaction Scale (Franke et al., 2019).”
Method
Impact of External Human–Machine Interface Communication Strategies of Automated Vehicles on Pedestrians’ Crossing Decisions and Behaviors in an Urban Environment
Wilbrink, M., Lau, M., Illgner, J., Schieben, A., & Oehl, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13158396 · Cited by 59
Explainable Automation: Personalized and Adaptive UIs to Foster Trust and Understanding of Driving Automation Systems
Wintersberger, P., Nicklas, H., Martlbauer, T., Hammer, S., & Riener, A. (2020) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3409120.3410659 · Cited by 66
Boosting people’s ability to detect microtargeted advertising
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Geers, M., Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., Lewandowsky, S., & Herzog, S. M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94796-z · Cited by 58
Collaborating Across Realities: Analytical Lenses for Understanding Dyadic Collaboration in Transitional Interfaces
Schröder, J.-H., Schacht, D., Peper, N., Hamurculu, A. M., & Jetter, H.-C. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580879 · Cited by 54
To Trust or Not To Trust: How a Conversational Interface Affects Trust in a Decision Support System
Gupta, A., Basu, D., Ghantasala, R., Qiu, S., & Gadiraju, U. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512248 · Cited by 61
“Look! It’s a Computer Program! It’s an Algorithm! It’s AI!”: Does Terminology Affect Human Perceptions and Evaluations of Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems?
Langer, M., Hunsicker, T., Feldkamp, T., König, C. J., & Grgić-Hlača, N. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517527 · Cited by 55
Offloading under cognitive load: humans are willing to offload parts of an attentionally demanding task to an algorithm
Wahn, B., Schmitz, L., Gerster, F. N., & Weiss, M. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286102 · Cited by 49
“The set consisted of the Desirability of Control Scale (20 items [25]), the Trust in Automation Scale (3-items-subset [26]), and the Affinity for Technological Systems Scale (9 items [27]).”
MethodResult
My new financial companion! non-linear understanding of Robo-advisory service acceptance
Aw, E. C., Zha, T. A., & Chuah, S. H. (2023) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2022.2161528 · Cited by 58
User Experience of Reading in Virtual Reality — Finding Values for Text Distance, Size and Contrast
Kojić, T., Ali, D., Greinacher, R., Möller, S., & Voigt‐Antons, J. (2020) · International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex48832.2020.9123091 · Cited by 49
Psychological Traits and Appropriate Reliance: Factors Shaping Trust in AI
Küper, A., & Krämer, N. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2348216 · Cited by 49
The Effect of Anthropomorphism and Failure Comprehensibility on Human-Robot Trust
Roesler, E., Onnasch, L., & Majer, J. I. (2020) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181320641028 · Cited by 48
Vividness of Visual Imagery and Personality Impact Motor-Imagery Brain Computer Interfaces
Leeuwis, N., Paas, A., & Alimardani, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.634748 · Cited by 48
One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian’s Perspective
Lau, M., Jipp, M., & Oehl, M. (2022) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2022.106641 · Cited by 47
Privacy vs. Security: Trade-Offs in the Acceptance of Smart Technologies for Aging-in-Place
Schomakers, E.-M., & Ziefle, M. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2078463 · Cited by 47
Optimizing human-AI collaboration: Effects of motivation and accuracy information in AI-supported decision-making
Eisbach, S., Langer, M., & Hertel, G. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100015 · Cited by 46
Perceived Empathy of Technology Scale (PETS): Measuring Empathy of Systems Toward the User
Schmidmaier, M., Rupp, J., Cvetanova, D., & Mayer, S. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642035 · Cited by 58
Teaming Up with an AI: Exploring Human–AI Collaboration in a Writing Scenario with ChatGPT
Luther, T., Kimmerle, J., & Creß, U. (2024) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai5030065 · Cited by 62
“You just can’t know about everything”: Privacy Perceptions of Smart Home Visitors
Marky, K., Prange, S., Krell, F., Mühlhäuser, M., & Alt, F. (2020) · International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM) · doi:10.1145/3428361.3428464 · Cited by 49
Servant by default? How humans perceive their relationship with conversational AI
Tschopp, M. V., Gieselmann, M., & Sassenberg, K. (2023) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2023-3-9 · Cited by 51
Voice-Based Agents as Personified Things: Assimilation and Accommodation as Equilibration of Doubt
Etzrodt, K., & Engesser, S. (2021) · Human-Machine Communication · doi:10.30658/hmc.2.3 · Cited by 44
Public acceptance of semi-automated truck platoon driving. A comparison between Germany and California
Castritius, S.-M., Lu, X., Bernhard, C., Liebherr, M., Schubert, P., & Hecht, H. (2020) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.013 · Cited by 43
Hazard Notifications for Cyclists: Comparison of Awareness Message Modalities in a Mixed Reality Study
von Sawitzky, T., Grauschopf, T., & Riener, A. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3490099.3511127 · Cited by 41
Evaluation of a Human–Machine Interface for Motion Sickness Mitigation Utilizing Anticipatory Ambient Light Cues in a Realistic Automated Driving Setting
Hainich, R., Drewitz, U., Ihme, K. A., Lauermann, J., Niedling, M., & Oehl, M. (2021) · Information · doi:10.3390/info12040176 · Cited by 42
Dealing with Uncertainty: Understanding the Impact of Prognostic Versus Diagnostic Tasks on Trust and Reliance in Human-AI Decision Making
Salimzadeh, S., He, G., & Gadiraju, U. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641905 · Cited by 41
“Additionally, we administered the Affinity for Technology Interaction Scale (ATI) [41] to determine participants’ level of comfort and familiarity with technology [120].”
Method
How Stated Accuracy of an AI System and Analogies to Explain Accuracy Affect Human Reliance on the System
He, G., Buijsman, S., & Gadiraju, U. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610067 · Cited by 56
Don't lose your coin! Investigating Security Practices of Cryptocurrency Users
Fröhlich, M., Gutjahr, F., & Alt, F. (2020) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3357236.3395535 · Cited by 40
Keep it Short: A Comparison of Voice Assistants’ Response Behavior
Haas, G., Rietzler, M., Jones, M., & Rukzio, E. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517684 · Cited by 46
Measuring the Propensity to Trust in Automated Technology: Examining Similarities to Dispositional Trust in Other Humans and Validation of the PTT-A Scale
Scholz, D. D., Kraus, J., & Miller, L. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2307691 · Cited by 47
“Attention! A Door Could Open.”—Introducing Awareness Messages for Cyclists to Safely Evade Potential Hazards
von Sawitzky, T., Grauschopf, T., & Riener, A. (2021) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti6010003 · Cited by 39
Dark Patterns in Online Shopping: of Sneaky Tricks, Perceived Annoyance and Respective Brand Trust
Voigt, C., Schlögl, S., & Groth, A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_10 · Cited by 38
Switching up the delivery game: Understanding switching intention to retail drone delivery services
Sham, R., Chong, H.-X., Aw, E. C.-X., Thangal, T. B. T., & Abdamia, N. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103478 · Cited by 35
How Usability Can Save the Day - Methodological Considerations for Making Automated Driving a Success Story
Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., & Krems, J. F. (2018) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3239060.3239076 · Cited by 38
Don’t Stop Me Now! Exploring Challenges Of First-Time Cryptocurrency Users
Froehlich, M., Wagenhaus, M. R., Schmidt, A., & Alt, F. (2021) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3461778.3462071 · Cited by 38
A social cognition perspective on autonomous technology
Frischknecht, R. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106815 · Cited by 45
An AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support System to Predict Flares in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pilot Study
Labinsky, H., Ukalovic, D., Hartmann, F., Runft, V., Wichmann, A., Jakubcik, J., Gambel, K., Otani, K., Morf, H., Taubmann, J., et al. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13010148 · Cited by 35
Insights into evaluating and using industrial exoskeletons: Summary report, guideline, and lessons learned from the interdisciplinary project “Exo@Work”
Ralfs, L., Hoffmann, N., Glitsch, U., Heinrich, K., Johns, J., & Weidner, R. (2023) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103494 · Cited by 35
How context and design shape human-robot trust and attributions
Biermann, H., Brauner, P., & Ziefle, M. (2020) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2021-0008 · Cited by 40
Understanding the Role of Explanation Modality in AI-assisted Decision-making
Robbemond, V., Inel, O., & Gadiraju, U. (2022) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3503252.3531311 · Cited by 41
Augmented reality interfaces for pedestrian-vehicle interactions: An online study
Tabone, W., Happee, R., García, J., Lee, Y. M., Lupetti, M. L., Merat, N., & de Winter, J. (2023) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2023.02.005 · Cited by 34
Cryptocurrencies have arrived, but are we ready? Unveiling cryptocurrency adoption recipes through an SEM-fsQCA approach
Sham, R. B., Aw, E. C., Abdamia, N., & Chuah, S. H. (2023) · The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances · doi:10.1108/bl-01-2022-0010 · Cited by 41
Machine Replacement: A Mind-Role Fit Perspective
Yam, K. C., Eng, A., & Gray, K. J. (2024) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-030223-044504 · Cited by 34
Human-Centered Design and Evaluation of a Workplace for the Remote Assistance of Highly Automated Vehicles
Schrank, A., Walocha, F., Brandenburg, S., & Oehl, M. (2024) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-024-00753-x · Cited by 33
Using WebXR Metaverse Platforms to Create Touristic Services and Cultural Promotion
Testón, A. M., Muñoz, A., Gracia, L., & Solanes, J. E. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13148544 · Cited by 37
End-user satisfaction of technology-enabled assessment in higher education: A coping theory perspective
Rajasekharan Pillai, K., Upadhyaya, P., Prakash, A. V., Ramaprasad, B. S., Mukesh, H. V., & Pai, Y. P. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10401-2 · Cited by 32
Individual costs and societal benefits: the privacy calculus of contact-tracing apps
Hauff, J. C., & Nilsson, J. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-03-2021-4559 · Cited by 31
Enhancing STEM Education through Interactive Metaverses: A Case Study and Methodological Framework
Solanes, J. E., Montava-Jordà, S., Laville, E. G., Colomer-Romero, V., Gracia, L., & Muñoz, A. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app131910785 · Cited by 37
“Nah, it’s just annoying!” A Deep Dive into User Perceptions of Two-Factor Authentication
Marky, K., Ragozin, K., Chernyshov, G., Matviienko, A., Schmitz, M., Mühlhäuser, M., Eghtebas, C., & Kunze, K. S. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3503514 · Cited by 31
Insights into the relationship between usability and willingness to use a robot in the future workplaces: Studying the mediating role of trust and the moderating roles of age and STARA
Babamiri, M., Heidarimoghadam, R., Ghasemi, F., Tapak, L., & Mortezapour, A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268942 · Cited by 30
Enriching User-Visitor Experiences in Digital Museology: Combining Social and Virtual Interaction within a Metaverse Environment
Alabau, A., Fabra, L., Testón, A. M., Muñoz, A., Solanes, J. E., & Gracia, L. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14093769 · Cited by 30
Characteristics of Users and Nonusers of Symptom Checkers in Germany: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
Kopka, M., Scatturin, L., Napierala, H., Fürstenau, D., Feufel, M. A., Balzer, F., & Schmieding, M. L. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/46231 · Cited by 26
A multi-method psychometric assessment of the affinity for technology interaction (ATI) scale
Lezhnina, O., & Kismihók, G. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100004 · Cited by 28
DEVELOPING PERSONAS TO HELP DESIGNERS TO UNDERSTAND DIGITAL EXCLUSION
Goodman-Deane, J., Bradley, M., Waller, S., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the Design Society · doi:10.1017/pds.2021.120 · Cited by 29
Performing a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test in immersive virtual reality to assess post-stroke upper limb activity
Burton, Q., Lejeune, T. M., Dehem, S., Lebrun, N., Ajana, K., Edwards, M., & Everard, G. J. (2022) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-022-01114-3 · Cited by 30
Effects of user factors on user experience in virtual reality: age, gender, and VR experience as influencing factors for VR exergames
Kojić, T., Spang, R. P., Vergari, M., Meier, L., Möller, S., & Voigt‐Antons, J. (2023) · Quality and User Experience · doi:10.1007/s41233-023-00056-5 · Cited by 36
Toward Inclusive Digital Mobility Services: a Population Perspective
Goodman-Deane, J., Kluge, J., Bosch, E. R., Nesterova, N. N., Bradley, M., Waller, S., Hoeke, L., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwac014 · Cited by 28
The Skewed Privacy Concerns of Bystanders in Smart Environments
Windl, M., & Mayer, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3546719 · Cited by 31
Software framework concept with visual programming and digital twin for intuitive process creation with multiple robotic systems
Niermann, D., Doernbach, T., Petzoldt, C., Isken, M., & Freitag, M. (2023) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102536 · Cited by 29
Listen to My Heart? How Privacy Concerns Shape Users’ Acceptance of e-Health Technologies
Schomakers, E.-M., Lidynia, C., & Ziefle, M. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob) · doi:10.1109/wimob.2019.8923448 · Cited by 30
The Finnish Version of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale: Psychometric Properties and an Examination of Gender Differences
Heilala, V., Kelly, R., Saarela, M., Jääskelä, P., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2049142 · Cited by 28
Toward a Holistic Communication Approach to an Automated Vehicle's Communication With Pedestrians: Combining Vehicle Kinematics With External Human-Machine Interfaces for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles
Lau, M., Jipp, M., & Oehl, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882394 · Cited by 27
Psychological Factors Influencing Appropriate Reliance on AI-enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Experimental Web-Based Study Among Dermatologists
Küper, A., Lodde, G. C., Livingstone, E., Schadendorf, D., & Krämer, N. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/58660 · Cited by 31
“Given the favorable disposition toward technology inherent in many of these factors, we intend to investigate affinity for technology interaction, defined as the inclination to actively engage in extensive technological interaction, as a fundamental personal asset for adapting to technology [61].”
Tariff option preferences for smart and bidirectional charging: Evidence from battery electric vehicle users in Germany
Helferich, M., Tröger, J., Stephan, A., Preuß, S., Pelka, S., Stute, J., & Plötz, P. (2024) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114240 · Cited by 32
Howdy, Robo-Partner: exploring artificial companionship and its stress-alleviating potential for service employees
Le, K. B. Q., & Cayrat, C. (2024) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-09-2023-0408 · Cited by 28
Digital Competence Scale (DCS)
Schwarz, S., Bieg, T., Svecnik, E., Schmölz, A., Geppert, C., & Gerdenitsch, C. (2024) · Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy · doi:10.18261/njdl.19.3.2 · Cited by 39
Towards Transparent Behavior of Automated Vehicles
Detjen, H., Salini, M., Kronenberger, J., Geisler, S., & Schneegaß, S. (2021) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) · doi:10.1145/3447526.3472041 · Cited by 29
Embodied Digital Technologies: First Insights in the Social and Legal Perception of Robots and Users of Prostheses
Mandl, S., Bretschneider, M., Meyer, S., Gesmann-Nuissl, D., Asbrock, F., Meyer, B. M., & Strobel, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2022.787970 · Cited by 25

Authors: Franke, T., Attig, C., & Wessel, D.
Affiliations: University of Lübeck (DE)
Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author: Franke, Thomas
ORCID: Franke, Thomas
Attig, Christiane
Wessel, Daniel
Venue: International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2018-03-30
Volume: 35
Issue: 6
Pages: 456-467
ISSN: 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
1532-7590
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150
OpenAlex: W2794740256
Cited by: 828
References: 63
Citations by year: 2026: 140 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 150 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6
FWCI: 63.90
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders: European Social Fund and the Free State of Saxony (100269974)
Topics: Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords: technology interaction, need for cognition, scale development, technical problem solving, user heterogeneity, Big Five personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks