The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale
Abstract
Successful coping with technology is relevant for mastering daily life. Based on related conceptions, we propose affinity for technology interaction (ATI), defined as the tendency to actively engage in intensive technology interaction, as a key personal resource for coping with technology. We present the 9-item ATI scale, an economical unidimensional scale that assesses ATI as an interaction style rooted in the construct need for cognition (NFC). Results of multiple studies (n > 1500) showed that the scale achieves good to excellent reliability, exhibits expected moderate to high correlations with geekism, technology enthusiasm, NFC, self-reported success in technical problem-solving and technical system learning success, and also with usage of technical systems. Further, correlations of ATI with the Big Five personality dimensions were weak at most. Based on the results, the ATI scale appears to be a promising tool for research applications such as the characterization of user diversity in system usability tests and the construction of general models of user-technology interaction.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, we administered the Afnity for Technology Interaction Scale (ATI) [41] to determine participants' level of comfort and familiarity with technology [120].”
From Dealing with Uncertainty: Understanding the Impact of Prognostic Versus Diagnostic Tasks on Trust and Reliance in Human-AI Decision Making (2024) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“We measured Affinity for Technology Interaction ( α = .92) using the scale from Franke et al. [50], which measures the construct on a 9-item scale.”
From Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication (2020) · cites this paper as Franke et al. [50]
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, the ATI scores, which usually correlate negatively with the age variable, are in our sample comparable to other studies that had a much more diverse age distribution among their participants (e.g., [50]).”
From Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication (2020) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Technical affinity was measured with the Affinity for Technology Interaction Scale (Franke et al., 2019). The questionnaire was answered on a 6-point scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (6) strongly agree (Cronbach α = 0.93).”
From Check the box! How to deal with automation bias in AI-based personnel selection (2023) · cites this paper as Franke et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“We used the Affinity for Technology Interaction scale by Franke et al [ 61 ], which consists of 9 items.”
From Psychological Factors Influencing Appropriate Reliance on AI-enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Experimental Web-Based Study Among Dermatologists (2025) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cites
A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis
Horn, J. L. (1965) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289447 · Cited by 8,965
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x · Cited by 6,835
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,483
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 · Cited by 4,244 · cited 5×
“The 10-item BFI-10 (Rammstedt & John, 2007) was used to assess the Big Five personality dimensions openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (Attig & Franke, 2017).”
MethodInfluentialConducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428104263675 · Cited by 3,104
eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World.
Norman, C. D., & Skinner, H. A. (2006) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9 · Cited by 2,643
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 · Cited by 2,517 · cited 3×
“NFC denotes that individuals differ regarding their tendency to engage in cognitive activities (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982; Cacioppo, Petty, Feinstein, & Jarvis, 1996).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Beier G., 1999, Report Psychologie, 9, 684
- Bless H., 1994, Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
- Karp, A. (2017). Untersuchung von Zusammenhängen zwischen Nutzungsmotivationen und Interaktionen mit Fitnessarmbändern [Examining relationships between usage motives and interactions with fitness trackers] (Bachelor’s thesis). Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
- Karrer K., 2009, Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme. 8. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme 7. bis 9. Oktober 2009, 196
- Keil, J. (2015). Exploring individual differences in the tendency to fall for the active user paradox (Bachelor’s thesis). University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands.
- Pieritz, S. (2017). Die Wirkung positiver vs. negativer Feedbackdarstellungen im Kontext von Gamification [The effect of positive vs. negative feedback presentations in the context of gamification] (Bachelor’s thesis). Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- Schwarze, D. (2017). Framing-effect and eco-driving: The impact on driving behaviour through different portrayals of eco-indicators (Bachelor’s thesis). Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- Stöhr, W. (2015). Exploring people’s resistance to the active user paradox including personality traits (Bachelor’s thesis). University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands.
- 10.1504/IJTM.1996.025468 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 830
Supporting User Onboarding in Automated Vehicles through Multimodal Augmented Reality Tutorials
Detjen, H., Degenhart, R. N., Schneegaß, S., & Geisler, S. (2021) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti5050022 · Cited by 13
Why robots should be technical
Hindemith, L., Göpfert, J. P., Wiebel-Herboth, C. B., Wrede, B., & Vollmer, A.-L. (2021) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.20023.hin · Cited by 13
Assessing User Experience of Text Readability with Eye Tracking in Virtual Reality
Kojić, T., Vergari, M., Möller, S., & Voigt‐Antons, J. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05939-1_13 · Cited by 13
Hub, F., & Oehl, M. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11172687 · Cited by 13
Marky, K., Gerber, N., Pelzer, M. G., Khamis, M., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2022) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.56553/popets-2022-0115 · Cited by 13
User Diversity in the Motivation for Wearable Activity Tracking: A Predictor for Usage Intensity?
Attig, C., Karp, A., & Franke, T. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_46 · Cited by 14
Self-citationFlohr, L. A., Janetzko, D., Wallach, D., Scholz, S. C., & Krüger, A. (2020) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3357236.3395468 · Cited by 13
Hofbauer, L. M., & Rodriguez, F. S. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063135 · Cited by 12
Gerber, N., Stöver, A., Peschke, J., & Zimmermann, V. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3617363 · Cited by 12
Weik, L., Fehring, L., Mortsiefer, A., & Meister, S. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/52085 · Cited by 13
Alfehaid, M. M., Hassan, T. H., Alfisal, A., SALEH, M. I., BUMBAK, S. V., & Helal, M. Y. I. (2024) · GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites · doi:10.30892/gtg.53202-1214 · Cited by 12
Connecting Home: Human-Centric Setup Automation in the Augmented Smart Home
Schenkluhn, M., Knierim, M. T., Kiss, F., & Weinhardt, C. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642862 · Cited by 16
Lee, H., & Youn, N. (2024) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.1177/02762374241282938 · Cited by 11
Schwarzkopf, M., Dettmann, A., & Bullinger, A. C. (2024) · Traffic Safety Research · doi:10.55329/cmdy6439 · Cited by 12
Lau, M., Wilbrink, M., & Oehl, M. (2024) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2024.10.022 · Cited by 17
Assessing Cognitive and Social Awareness among Group Members in AI-assisted Collaboration
de Jong, S., Wester, J., Schrills, T., Secher, K. S., Griggio, C. F., & van Berkel, N. (2024) · International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM) · doi:10.1145/3701571.3701582 · Cited by 12
von Wolff, R. M., Hobert, S., & Schümann, M. (2022) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00180 · Cited by 12
Langerak, A. J., Regterschot, G. R. H., Evers, M., van Beijnum, B.-J. F., Meskers, C. G. M., Selles, R. W., Ribbers, G. M., & Bussmann, J. B. J. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23135868 · Cited by 11
Smartwatch-Based Interventions for People With Dementia: User-Centered Design Approach
Göerß, D., Köhler, S., Rong, E., Temp, A. G. M., Kilimann, I., Bieber, G., & Teipel, S. J. (2024) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/50107 · Cited by 12
Analyzing the drivers of blockchain adoption for supply chain in Pakistan
Khalil, M., & Ahmed, W. (2024) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-10-2023-0178 · Cited by 11
Salimzadeh, S., & Gadiraju, U. (2024) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3627043.3659567 · Cited by 14
Schwindt-Drews, S., Storms, K., Peters, S., & Abendroth, B. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3443927 · Cited by 11
Lingam, S. N., Verstegen, R., Petermeijer, S. M., & Martens, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1580289 · Cited by 11
Investigation of Personality Traits and Driving Styles for Individualization of Autonomous Vehicles
Brück, Y., Niermann, D., Trende, A., & Lüdtke, A. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68017-6_12 · Cited by 11
Moll, V. E., & Franke, T. (2021) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103399 · Cited by 13
Self-citationThe Feet in Human-Centred Security: Investigating Foot-Based User Authentication for Public Displays
Watson, K., Bretin, R., Khamis, M., & Mathis, F. (2022) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519838 · Cited by 11
Perception of Risks and Usefulness of Smart Video Surveillance Systems
Golda, T., Guaia, D., & Wagner-Hartl, V. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app122010435 · Cited by 14
Hub, F., Oehl, M., Hesse, T., & Seifert, K. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103043 · Cited by 12
Dhungel, A.-K., Wessel, D., Zoubir, M., & Heine, M. (2021) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3473856.3473998 · Cited by 11
Self-citationMännlich, mittelalt, gebildet – oder?
Attig, C. (2020) · kommunikation gesellschaft · doi:10.15460/kommges.2020.21.2.626 · Cited by 10
Self-citationHub, F., Heß, S., Lau, M., Wilbrink, M., & Oehl, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2023.1154476 · Cited by 10
Nguyen, P., & Süß, S. (2023) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997231198847 · Cited by 10
Gödker, M., Moll, V. E., & Franke, T. (2024) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208231222154 · Cited by 11
Self-citationRoesler, E., Rudolph, S., & Siebert, F. W. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-024-01098-1 · Cited by 10
Rodriguez, S. D., Chatterjee, P., Phuong, A. D., Alt, F., & Marky, K. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642863 · Cited by 10
SafeARCross: Augmented Reality Collision Warnings and Virtual Traffic Lights for Pedestrian Safety
Clérigo, A., Schrapel, M., Teixeira, P., Rito, P., Sargento, S., & Vinel, A. V. (2024) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3640792.3675734 · Cited by 10
Brandt, T., Wilbrink, M., & Oehl, M. (2024) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.006 · Cited by 17
Humanoid patient robot for diagnostic training in medical and psychiatric education
Schwarz, P., Hellmers, S., Spanknebel, S., Hurlemann, R., & Hein, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1424845 · Cited by 10
Walocha, F., Schrank, A., Nguyen, H. P., & Ihme, K. A. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16010064 · Cited by 12
Boß, L., Ross, J., Reis, D., Pischel, S., Mallwitz, T., Brückner, H., Tanner, G., Nissen, H., Kalon, L., Schümann, M., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105076 · Cited by 11
Soto-Sanfiel, M. T., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Lutz, C. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05978-3 · Cited by 42
Mirror or camera? Acceptance and valuation of camera-monitor systems
Bernhard, C., & Hecht, H. (2021) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2021.100512 · Cited by 10
Stange, V., Steimle, M., Maurer, M., & Vollrath, M. (2022) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2022.100701 · Cited by 10
Gerdenitsch, C., Sackl, A., & Hold, P. (2022) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103384 · Cited by 10
Azizi, N., Chandra, S., Gray, M., Fane, J., Sager, M., & Dautenhahn, K. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_14 · Cited by 10
Digital affinitiy and cognitive reserve: Salience for resilient aging in pandemic
Cilli, E., Ranieri, J., Guerra, F., Colicchia, S., & Giacomo, D. D. (2023) · Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1177/23337214231162773 · Cited by 10
Häfner, J., Schönfeld, S., Tokgöz, P., Hrynyschyn, R., Schlubach, A., & Dockweiler, C. (2021) · Psychiatrische Praxis · doi:10.1055/a-1472-5388 · Cited by 10
Keil, M., Markert, P., & Dürmuth, M. (2022) · European Symposium on Usable Security (EuroUSEC) · doi:10.1145/3549015.3554208 · Cited by 10
Robot Touch to Send Sympathy: Divergent Perspectives of Senders and Recipients
Au, R. H. Y., Ling, K., Fraune, M. R., & Tsui, K. M. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889419 · Cited by 11
Subjektive Sicherheit zur Steigerung der Akzeptanz des automatisierten und vernetzten Fahrens
Drewitz, U., Wilbrink, M., Oehl, M., Jipp, M., & Ihme, K. A. (2021) · Forschung im Ingenieurwesen · doi:10.1007/s10010-021-00500-y · Cited by 10
Henrich, M., Kleespies, M. W., Dierkes, P. W., & Formella-Zimmermann, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.970212 · Cited by 9
Promoting sustainable behaviors through mobile apps: SBAM design guidelines
Tancredi, C., Presta, R., & Lorenzo, V. D. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-18299-5 · Cited by 12
The Impact of Data Privacy on Users' Smartphone App Adoption Decisions
Bemmann, F., & Mayer, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3676525 · Cited by 12
Zoubir, M., Schwarz, B., Heidinger, J., Gruner, M., Jetter, H.-C., & Franke, T. (2025) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-025-00789-7 · Cited by 14
Self-citationKornowicz, J., & Thommes, K. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318874 · Cited by 14
P(doom) Versus AI Optimism: Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and the Factors That Shape Them
Guingrich, R. E., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2025) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-025-00512-3 · Cited by 13
Investigating LLM-Driven Curiosity in Human-Robot Interaction
Leusmann, J., Belardinelli, A., Haliburton, L., Hasler, S., Schmidt, A., Mayer, S., Gienger, M., & Wang, C. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713923 · Cited by 9
Schrank, A., Wilbrink, M., Brandenburg, S., & Oehl, M. (2025) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2025.05.017 · Cited by 12
Social Loafing with Robots – An Empirical Investigation
Onnasch, L., & Panayotidis, T. (2020) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181320641026 · Cited by 9
Supporting users in data disclosure scenarios in agriculture through transparency
Linsner, S., Steinbrink, E., Kuntke, F., Franken, J., & Reuter, C. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2068070 · Cited by 9
Weigl, K., Schartmüller, C., & Riener, A. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2073473 · Cited by 9
Coaching Robots for Younger Seniors: Do They Get What They Expect? Insights from an Austrian Study
Schneider, C., & Bousbiat, H. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20042965 · Cited by 11
Perotti, L., Stamm, O., Mesletzky, L., Vorwerg, S., Fournelle, M., & Müller‐Werdan, U. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20064927 · Cited by 10
Leusmann, J., Oechsner, C., Prinz, J., Welsch, R., & Mayer, S. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3585884 · Cited by 9
Technikaffinität als Ressource für die Arbeit in Industrie 4.0
Attig, C., Mach, S., Wessel, D., Franke, T., Schmalfuß, F., & Krems, J. F. (2018) · aw&I Conference · doi:10.14464/awic.v3i0.251 · Cited by 9
Self-citationTwo is Better Than One. Improved Attention Guiding in AR by Combining Techniques
Hein, P., Bernhagen, M., & Bullinger, A. C. (2020) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/mcg.2020.3012274 · Cited by 9
Digital mobility services: A population perspective
Goodman-Deane, J., Kluge, J., Bosch, E. R., Nesterova, N. N., Bradley, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2021.15 · Cited by 9
Shahu, A., Wintersberger, P., & Michahelles, F. (2022) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519693 · Cited by 9
Determinants of willingness to donate data from social media platformsPreprint
Kmetty, Z., Stefkovics, Á., Számely, J., Deng, D., Anikó, K., Omodei, E., Pauló, E., & Koltai, J. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ncwkt · Cited by 9
On the Role of Large Language Models in Crowdsourcing Misinformation Assessment
Xu, J., Han, L., Sadiq, S. W., & Demartini, G. (2024) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31417 · Cited by 12
Cocchia, L., Vergari, M., Kojić, T., Vona, F., Möller, S., Garzotto, F., & Voigt‐Antons, J. (2024) · International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex61742.2024.10598279 · Cited by 8
Babamiri, M., Heidarimoghadam, R., Ghasemi, F., Tapak, L., & Mortezapour, A. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-024-01183-5 · Cited by 8
Acosta, L. H., & Reinhardt, D. (2025) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104302 · Cited by 8
Leveraging Blockchain for Transparency: A Study on Organ Supply Chains and Transplant Processes
Panigrahi, R. R., Mukherjee, S., Shaikh, Z. H., & Nomran, N. M. (2025) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics9010009 · Cited by 10
Rosteck, N., Striegl, J., & Loitsch, C. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3720043 · Cited by 13
Leusmann, J., Villa, S., Berberoglu, B., Wang, C., & Mayer, S. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713087 · Cited by 10
Zimmermann, V., Toth, A., Sievers, H., Fanconi, L., Isenring, Y., Henz, M., Stöver, A., & Gerber, N. (2025) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp61157.2025.00240 · Cited by 8
de Jong, S., Bos, M. W., van Berkel, N., & Lamers, M. H. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2535732 · Cited by 19
The Zenith of Flow Consciousness in Metaverse: Glancing the Consumer Behavior in the Future
Noor, U., Mansoor, M., Khan, T. I., & Khattak, M. N. (2025) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.70120 · Cited by 8
Demir, E. K., Çüm, S., & Kışla, T. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2202551 · Cited by 8
Ah, Alright, Okay! Communicating Understanding in Conversational Product Search
Papenmeier, A., & Topp, E. A. (2023) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3571884.3604318 · Cited by 8
e-VITA study protocol: EU-Japan virtual coach for smart aging
Bevilacqua, R., Stara, V., Amabili, G., Margaritini, A., Benadduci, M., Barbarossa, F., Maranesi, E., Rigaud, A., Dacunha, S., Palmier, C., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1256734 · Cited by 8
Buchner, C., Himmels, C., Schmitz, J., Stoll, T., & Baumann, M. (2024) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3640792.3675709 · Cited by 8
I Wish You Were Smart(er): Investigating Users' Desires and Needs Towards Home Appliances
Prange, S., & Alt, F. (2020) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3334480.3382910 · Cited by 8
Preusse, H. R., Skulsky, R., Fraune, M. R., & Stringam, B. B. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.730399 · Cited by 8
Emerson, E. J., Ford, R. C., & Simsek, K. D. (2022) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103295 · Cited by 8
Designing Interactive Chatbot Development Systems
Feine, J., Morana, S., & Maedche, A. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 8
Tokgöz, P., Hafner, J., & Dockweiler, C. (2023) · Das Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1055/a-2098-3108 · Cited by 5
“Ferner war die Mehrheit der befragten Personen zwischen 30 und 50 Jahre alt. Es konnte kaum Einblicke in die subjektive Sichtweise von Personen erlangt werden, die KI-ba-sierte EUS zur Antibiotikavorhersage strikt ablehnen, da hier über-wiegend eine mittlere Technikaffinität vorlag.”
Perceptions and attitudes of bicyclists towards self-driving cars: a mixed methods approach
Luger–Bazinger, C., Hollauf, E.-M., Atasayar, H., Zankl, C., & Hornung–Prähauser, V. (2023) · Frontiers in Future Transportation · doi:10.3389/ffutr.2023.1174956 · Cited by 7
Yang, F.-C., & Tasi, P.-W. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-17417-z · Cited by 11
Wybraniec, B., Bosch, E. R., Ortego, M. I., & Lazzarini, B. (2024) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100818 · Cited by 7
Eitrheim, M. H. R., Nordfjærn, T., Log, M. M., & Tørset, T. (2024) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2024.2423202 · Cited by 7
Yurrita, M., Verma, H., Balayn, A., Gadiraju, U., Pont, S. C., & Bozzon, A. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713145 · Cited by 11
Reissig, L., & Siegrist, M. (2025) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2025.101095 · Cited by 7
Häfner, J., Tokgöz, P., & Dockweiler, C. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13212717 · Cited by 7
Köhler, S., Koldrack, P., Zarm, K., Weschke, S., Klein, O. A., Kirste, T., & Teipel, S. J. (2021) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2021.20.2.435.04 · Cited by 7
Heidinger, J., Bernhardt, L., & Franke, T. (2023) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3581961.3609881 · Cited by 7
Self-citationPerception of embodied digital technologies: robots and telepresence systems
Mandl, S., Brade, J., Bretschneider, M., Asbrock, F., Meyer, B. M., Jahn, G., Klimant, P., & Strobel, A. (2023) · Human-Intelligent Systems Integration · doi:10.1007/s42454-023-00049-x · Cited by 7
ROVER: A Standalone Overlay Tool for Questionnaires in Virtual Reality
Küntzer, L., Schwab, S. U., Spaderna, H., & Rock, G. (2024) · ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS) · doi:10.1145/3660515.3661328 · Cited by 7
Zimmermann, V., Schäfer, S., Dürmuth, M., & Marky, K. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3702318 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Franke, T., Attig, C., & Wessel, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Franke, Thomas
- Venue
- International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-30
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 456-467
- ISSN
- 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7590
- OpenAlex
- W2794740256
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 140 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 150 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 63.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Social Fund and the Free State of Saxony (100269974)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- technology interaction, need for cognition, scale development, technical problem solving, user heterogeneity, Big Five personality traits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
