Cited by 102Social Robot Interaction and HRIAI in Service InteractionsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Who Do You Prefer? The Effect of Age, Gender and Role on Users’ First Impressions of Embodied Conversational Agents in eHealth

Open access
ter Stal, Silke, Tabak, Monique, op den Akker, Harm, Beinema, Tessa, Hermens, Hermie·2020·International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

Abstract

Embodied conversational agents may be used to engage users in adopting eHealth applications. The aim of this research is to investigate which design features establish a positive first impression of an agent in this context. A set of eight static agent images, different in age, gender and role, were subjected to testing in an online questionnaire. Respondents (n = 155) selected their preferred design and rated the characteristics – friendliness, expertise, reliability, involvement and authority – and the likeliness of following the agent’s advice for all designs. In addition, focus groups (n = 13) were conducted for detailed understandings supporting these impressions. Our results show that, for both a general and elderly population, (1) people seem to prefer images of young, female agents over old, male agents, (2) the (a) age, (b) gender and (c) role of the agent image affect the perception of the agent’s characteristics and the likeliness of following the agent’s advice, and that (3) both the general and elderly population prefer an agent image that is similar in (a) age and (b) gender. A next step would be to investigate how the characteristics of the agent designs are perceived after interaction with the agent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10447318.2019.1699744

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At first glance, static images of male and older agents are seen as more authoritative than female and young agents, respectively.

    “From a previous study [16], we see that at first glance, static images of male and older agents are indeed seen as more authoritative than female and young agents, respectively.”
  • Differences found in authority are often higher compared with differences found for other characteristics.

    “the study shows that the differences found in authority are often higher compared with differences found for other characteristics”
  • In a previous study, ter Stal et al found that characteristics of older and male agents were perceived differently than characteristics of young and female agents, and that older adults seem to prefer a young female over an older male agent.

    “In one study, ter Stal et al [16] identified people’s first impressions of agents varying in age, gender, and role using a zero acquaintance approach: there was no interaction involved, and participants rated static agent images at first glance. The study shows that characteristics of older and male agents were perceived differently than characteristics of young and female agents, respectively. In”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ter Stal, S., Tabak, M., op den Akker, H., Beinema, T., & Hermens, H.
Affiliations
  • eHealth Group, Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands
  • Roessingh Research and Development (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
Published
2019-12-16
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
881-892
ISSN
  • 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7590
OpenAlex
W2995151517
Cited by
102
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Commission (731656, HORIZON2020, 769553)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
embodied conversational agents, e-health, first impressions, agent roles, user preferences, trust in agents, elderly users, human-robot interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review