Cited by 23Technology Use by Older AdultsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personal, Social and Regulatory Factors Associated With Telecare Acceptance by Hong Kong Older Adults: An Indication of Governmental Role in Facilitating Telecare Adoption

Peng, Lu, Man, Siu Shing, Chan, Alan H. S., Ng, Jacky Y. K.·2023·International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Telecare has the potential to tackle emerging problems in public healthcare resulting from the graying of population. This study aims to investigate the personal, social and regulatory factors associated with the telecare acceptance for older adults in Hong Kong. A structured questionnaire survey was administered to 110 seniors aged 60–80 years. The results revealed that older people prefer to use the products that they are familiar with. Seniors of very poor economic status are likely to use telecare service. Family and friends support, self-satisfaction, and social relationship are critical factors which positively influence telecare usage of older adults via influencing their perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Regulatory factor of perceived incentives positively associates with the attitude of older people toward telecare service, and in turn facilitates telecare usage. This is the first study which stressed that public regulations, such as incentive interventions, should be emphasized in promoting telecare acceptance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10447318.2022.2050539

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Austin, N. (2012). Implications of an aging workforce [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at the ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition, Colorado.
  2. Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  3. Meidert U., 2013, Telecare: Technology for an ageing society in Europe. Current state and future developments

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peng, L., Man, S. S., Chan, A. H. S., & Ng, J. Y. K.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Man, Siu Shing
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2022-04-20
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
1059-1071
ISSN
  • 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7590
OpenAlex
W4224252822
Cited by
23
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • General Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Universities of Jiangsu China (2021SJA0060)
  • Humanity and Social Science Funding of Fundamental Research Expenses of Central Government Higher Education of Nanjing Agricultural University (SKYC2021024)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71804007)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
telecare, technology acceptance, older adults, technology adoption, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, family and social support, economic status, government incentives, regulatory factors, population aging, Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review