Cited by 583Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTechnology Use by Older Adults

Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial

Open access
Steventon, A., Bardsley, M., Billings, J., Dixon, J., Doll, H., Hirani, S., Cartwright, M., Rixon, L. +7 more·2012·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of home based telehealth interventions on the use of secondary healthcare and mortality. DESIGN: Pragmatic, multisite, cluster randomised trial comparing telehealth with usual care, using data from routine administrative datasets. General practice was the unit of randomisation. We allocated practices using a minimisation algorithm, and did analyses by intention to treat. SETTING: 179 general practices in three areas in England. PARTICIPANTS: 3230 people with diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or heart failure recruited from practices between May 2008 and November 2009. INTERVENTIONS: Telehealth involved remote exchange of data between patients and healthcare professionals as part of patients' diagnosis and management. Usual care reflected the range of services available in the trial sites, excluding telehealth. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of patients admitted to hospital during 12 month trial period. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar at baseline. Compared with controls, the intervention group had a lower admission proportion within 12 month follow-up (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.97, P = 0.017). Mortality at 12 months was also lower for intervention patients than for controls (4.6% v 8.3%; odds ratio 0.54, 0.39 to 0.75, P < 0.001). These differences in admissions and mortality remained significant after adjustment. The mean number of emergency admissions per head also differed between groups (crude rates, intervention 0.54 v control 0.68); these changes were significant in unadjusted comparisons (incidence rate ratio 0.81, 0.65 to 1.00, P = 0.046) and after adjusting for a predictive risk score, but not after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Length of hospital stay was shorter for intervention patients than for controls (mean bed days per head 4.87 v 5.68; geometric mean difference -0.64 days, -1.14 to -0.10, P = 0.023, which remained significant after adjustment). Observed differences in other forms of hospital use, including notional costs, were not significant in general. Differences in emergency admissions were greatest at the beginning of the trial, during which we observed a particularly large increase for the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth is associated with lower mortality and emergency admission rates. The reasons for the short term increases in admissions for the control group are not clear, but the trial recruitment processes could have had an effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN43002091.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.e3874

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steventon, A., Bardsley, M., Billings, J., Dixon, J., Doll, H., Hirani, S., Cartwright, M., Rixon, L., Knapp, M., Henderson, C., Rogers, A., Fitzpatrick, R., Hendy, J., Newman, S., & for the Whole System Demonstrator Evaluation Team
Affiliations
  • Nuffield Trust (GB)
  • Wagner College (US)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Steventon, A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-06-21
Volume
344
Issue
jun21 3
Pages
e3874-e3874
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970039259
Cited by
583
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 20
FWCI
77.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University College London
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I029788/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
telemedicine, hospitalization, mortality, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, remote patient monitoring, emergency admissions, length of hospital stay, general practice, health care costs, predictive risk score, intention-to-treat analysis, primary care intervention, health disparities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergency Service, Hospital, England, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Cluster Analysis, Logistic Models, Telemedicine, Young Adult, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review