Cited by 8Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisDigital Media and Visual ArtInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Mitigating Viewer Impact From Disturbing Imagery Using AI Filters: A User-Study

Sarridis, Ioannis, Spangenberg, Jochen, Papadopoulou, Olga, Papadopoulos, Symeon·2025·International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

Abstract

Exposure to disturbing imagery can significantly impact individuals, especially professionals who encounter such content as part of their work. This article presents a user study, involving 107 participants, predominantly journalists and human rights investigators, that explores the capability of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based image filters to potentially mitigate the emotional impact of viewing such disturbing content. We tested five different filter styles, both traditional (Blurring and Partial Blurring) and AI-based (Drawing, Colored Drawing, and Painting), and measured their effectiveness in terms of conveying image information while reducing emotional distress. Our main findings suggest that the AI-based Drawing style filter demonstrates the best performance, offering a promising solution for reducing negative feelings (−30.38%) while preserving the interpretability of the image (97.19%). Overall, this article contributes to the development of a more ethically considerate and effective visual environment for professionals routinely engaging with potentially disturbing imagery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10447318.2024.2313890

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies evaluating technological interventions such as image modification through blurring and filters found positive effects like reduced negative feelings while retaining operational efficiency.

    “On one hand some studies (13–15), evaluating technological interventions such as image modification through blurring and filters, found positive effects like reduced negative feelings while retaining operational efficiency.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarridis, I., Spangenberg, J., Papadopoulou, O., & Papadopoulos, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
  • Deutsche Welle (DE)
Corresponding author
Sarridis, Ioannis
Venue
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
Published
2024-03-13
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
1234-1245
ISSN
  • 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7590
OpenAlex
W4392761621
Cited by
8
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
MediaVerse (957252)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
image blurring, image stylization, journalists, image interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review