Cited by 4,540Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDigital Media Forensic Detection

Generative Adversarial Networks: An Overview

Open access
Creswell, Antonia, White, Tom, Dumoulin, Vincent, Arulkumaran, Kai, Sengupta, Biswa, Bharath, Anil A.·2018·IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Abstract

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) provide a way to learn deep representations without extensively annotated training data. They achieve this by deriving backpropagation signals through a competitive process involving a pair of networks. The representations that can be learned by GANs may be used in a variety of applications, including image synthesis, semantic image editing, style transfer, image superresolution, and classification. The aim of this review article is to provide an overview of GANs for the signal processing community, drawing on familiar analogies and concepts where possible. In addition to identifying different methods for training and constructing GANs, we also point to remaining challenges in their theory and application.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/msp.2017.2765202

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GAN is a deep generative model for learning latent representation and producing artificial datasets of original datasets.

    “The generative adversarial network (GAN) is another deep generative model for learning the latent representation and producing artificial datasets of the original datasets [58].”
  • GANs mainly consist of two models: a generator G and a discriminator D.

    “Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) [45,71,79] mainly consist of two models: a generator G and a discriminator D.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [5][5] A. Radford, L. Metz, and S. Chintala, 'Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks,' in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) - workshop track , 2016. -
  2. [6][6] A. Creswell and A. A. Bharath, 'Adversarial training for sketch retrieval,' in Computer Vision - ECCV 2016 Workshops: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 8-10 and 15-16, 2016, Proceedings, Part I . Springer International Publishing, 2016. -
  3. [11][11] Y. Bengio, L. Yao, G. Alain, and P . Vincent, 'Generalized denoising auto-encoders as generative models,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2013, pp. 899-907. -
  4. [18][18] Z. C. Lipton and S. Tripathi, 'Precise recovery of latent vectors from generative adversarial networks,' in ICLR (workshop track) , 2017. -
  5. [19][19] V. Dumoulin, I. Belghazi, B. Poole, O. Mastropietro, A. Lamb, M. Arjovsky, and A. Courville, 'Adversarially learned inference,' in (accepted, to appear) Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations , 2017. -
  6. [20][20] J. Donahue, P. Krähenbühl, and T. Darrell, 'Adversarial feature learning,' in (accepted, to appear) Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations , 2017. -
  7. [26][26] M. Arjovsky and L. Bottou, 'Towards principled methods for training generative adversarial networks,' NIPS 2016 Workshop on Adversarial Training , 2016. -
  8. [41][41] M.-Y. Liu and O. Tuzel, 'Coupled generative adversarial networks,' in Advances in neural information processing systems , 2016, pp. 469-477. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creswell, A., White, T., Dumoulin, V., Arulkumaran, K., Sengupta, B., & Bharath, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • School of Design, University of Wellington, Victoria, New Zealand
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
Published
2018-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
53-65
ISSN
  • 1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0792
OpenAlex
W2765811365
Cited by
4,540
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 383 · 2025: 859 · 2024: 1165 · 2023: 862 · 2022: 556 · 2021: 329 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 3
FWCI
88.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • University of Georgia
  • Imperial College London
  • Victoria University of Wellington
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
generative adversarial networks, unsupervised learning, deep representations, image generation, semantic image editing, style transfer, image super-resolution, GAN architectures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review