Consumer Attitudes and Preferences toward Cross-Cultural Ready-To-Eat (RTE) Food
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the consumer attitudes and preferences toward cross-cultural ready-to-eat (RTE) food between Thailand and Japan. Interview, descriptive statistics, t-test, and conjoint analysis were applied in this research. The results revealed that Thai and Japanese participants had negative attitudes toward taste and freshness of cross-cultural RTE food. Moreover, these two factors were the primarily concerned factors when they made a decision to purchase RTE food. The image of Thai/Japanese RTE food could be represented by the characteristic and the famous name of food. Besides, the results from conjoint analysis showed that Thai consumers preferred the adapted taste between Japanese and Thai flavors. The design of food packaging should be the clear container lid with the label so that consumers can see the food inside. On the contrary, Japanese consumers preferred an authentic Thai taste and the design should be the colorful picture on the food container lid.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Singles prefer ready-to-cook foods because of convenience, ease, and variety.
“When it comes to single's, they prefer them because of the convenience, ease, and variety [18].”
From Consumer Behavior and Emotional Satisfaction: Ready-To-Cook Food Products in India (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research
Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667 · Cited by 1,636 · see citing works
Food quality: Relativity, context and consumer expectations
Cardello, A. V. (1995) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/0950-3293(94)00039-x · Cited by 293 · see citing works
de Boer, M., McCarthy, M., Cowan, C., & Ryan, I. (2004) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(03)00054-5 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Gatley, A., Caraher, M., & Lang, T. (2014) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.12.014 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consumer Behavior and Emotional Satisfaction: Ready-To-Cook Food Products in India
Ganapathiraju, M., & Fernandes, S. (2022) · CARDIOMETRY · doi:10.18137/cardiometry.2022.23.728740 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thienhirun, S., & Chung, S.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Thienhirun, Supimmas
- Venue
- Journal of Food Products Marketing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-79
- ISSN
- 1045-4446 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4102
- OpenAlex
- W2583685854
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Food Products Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
- Keywords
- ready-to-eat foods, consumer attitudes, consumer preferences, purchase decision factors, food packaging design, food images, food labeling, food adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review