Cited by 292Decolonial Thought and EpistemologiesEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesLatin American Cultural Politics

Decolonizing environmental justice studies: A Latin American perspective

Open access
Álvarez, Lina, Coolsaet, Brendan·2020·Capitalism Nature Socialism

Abstract

The “environment” and “justice” of environmental justice are often defined through Western ways of thinking. Empirical environmental justice research, however, increasingly takes place in the context of the global South. As a result, there is a tendency to transpose Western concepts and frameworks to the global South, running the risk of being ineffective and of producing additional injustices. Drawing on decolonial thought, a Latin American and Caribbean theoretical movement, this paper analyses the problems which arise when Western concepts are used as the main organizing principles of non-Western environmental justice movements. Examples include failing to account for cases involving mutually undermining modes of life, hence presenting deliberate exposure to environmental harm as a fair solution; rendering invisible the fact that “participation” may contribute to the reproduction of environmental injustices, sometimes with the consent of those who are likely to be the first victims of environmental injustices; or reproducing the idea that communities in the global South do not produce knowledge, that their knowledge is inferior, or only useful for empirical observation, while Western science provides for the underlying theoretical framework. We conclude by highlighting some of the principles of a decolonial environmental justice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10455752.2018.1558272

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Critical and decolonial incarnations of environmental justice are pushing decolonial and anti-colonial concerns front and center.

    “while critical and decolonial incarnations are pushing decolonial and anti-colonial concerns front and center (Pellow, 2016; Álvarez & Coolsaet, 2020; Rodriguez, 2020; Tornel, 2023a; Dunlap, 2023a).”

    From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Álvarez & Coolsaet, 2020

  • The EDC framework has an implicit statism that does not represent autonomous Indigenous and non-Indigenous concerns.

    “Thinking in these terms' points to an implicit statism—to mediate inequalities—in the EDC framework that does not represent autonomous Indigenous and non-Indigenous concerns (see Temper, 2019; Álvarez & Coolsaet, 2020; Dunlap, 2023a).”

    From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Álvarez & Coolsaet, 2020

  • Ecological struggles are not strictly limited to the distribution of costs and benefits of particular development or extractivist projects.

    “The critiques of EDCs begin with recognizing that ecological struggles are not strictly limited to the 'distribution' of the 'costs' and 'benefits' of particular 'development' or extractivist projects (Álvarez & Coolsaet, 2020).”

    From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Álvarez & Coolsaet, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Álvarez, L., & Coolsaet, B.
Affiliations
  • Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Coolsaet, Brendan
Venue
Capitalism Nature Socialism
Published
2018-12-17
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
50-69
ISSN
  • 1045-5752 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-3290
OpenAlex
W2903593673
Cited by
292
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6
FWCI
59.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Capitalism Nature Socialism (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
Keywords
environmental justice, decoloniality, Global South, environmental justice movement, indigenous knowledge, epistemic inequality, environmental harm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review