Cited by 42Asian Geopolitics and EthnographyPeacebuilding and International SecurityEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones

The sustainability–peace nexus in crisis contexts: how the Rohingya escaped the ethnic violence in Myanmar, but are trapped into environmental challenges in Bangladesh

Open access
Ahmed, Saleh, Simmons, William Paul, Chowdhury, Rashed, Huq, Saleemul·2021·Sustainability Science

Abstract

Because of ethnic and cultural violence in Myanmar, approximately a million Rohingya fled to neighboring Bangladesh starting from August 2017, in what the UN has called a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing”. Those arriving in Bangladesh were able to escape decade-long ethnic violence in Myanmar, but the Rohingya’s immediate destination, Cox’s Bazar district is one of the most climate-vulnerable and disaster-prone areas in Bangladesh. Currently, they have been subjected to extreme rainfalls, landslides, and flashfloods. With the COVID-19 pandemic, they continue to face fear and further marginalization in resource-constrained Bangladesh, as well as increased vulnerability due to tropical cyclones, flashfloods, and landslides. The Rohingya in southeast Bangladesh are now at the epicenter of a humanitarian and sustainability crisis. However, their situation is not entirely unique. Millions of displaced, stateless or refugees around the world are facing multi-dimensional crises in various complex geopolitical, and climatic situations. Using the theoretical lens of political ecology and critical development studies, this paper analyzes the sustainability–peace nexus for millions of Rohingya in Myanmar and in Bangladesh. This paper is based on information from various sources, including three ethnographic field visits in recent years, which helped to get local insights into the current sustainability challenges in this humanitarian context. The core arguments of this paper suggest that sustainability–peace nexus will especially be compromised in climate-vulnerable resource-constrained conditions. To overcome this challenge, decolonizing Rohingya solutions would be critical, by engaging the Rohingya in the process of development and meaningful change, which can affect their lives, livelihoods, and wellbeing. Even though this paper has a specific geographical focus, the insights are relevant in parts of the world facing similar social, economic, political, and environmental challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11625-021-00955-6

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. IPCC Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmed, S., Simmons, W. P., Chowdhury, R., & Huq, S.
Affiliations
  • Boise State University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Independent University, Bangladesh (BD)
Corresponding author
Ahmed, Saleh
Venue
Sustainability Science
Published
2021-04-19
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1201-1213
ISSN
  • 1862-4057 (ISSN-L)
  • 1862-4065
OpenAlex
W3154059473
Cited by
42
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
24.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Keywords
Rohingya refugees, ethnic violence, ethnic cleansing, climate change vulnerability, disaster risk, landslides, tropical cyclones, COVID-19 pandemic, statelessness, decolonization, political ecology, critical development studies, Cox's Bazar, refugee livelihoods, resource constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review