The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indoor Particles: A Review
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews studies of particle concentrations and sources in homes and buildings. Three major studies of indoor and outdoor concentrations in U.S. homes are summarized in detail and compared. A number of smaller studies in homes are also briefly summarized. One study of 38 buildings and several smaller studies of buildings are also reviewed. All major studies found that an important indoor source of fine and coarse particles was cigarette smoking, with estimated increases in homes with smokers ranging from 25 to 45 µg/m3 PM2 5. Several studies identified cooking as a second important source. All of the three major studies found a substantial portion of indoor particles to be due to unexplained indoor sources, suggesting a topic for future research. One study also found a large unexplained increase in personal exposure to PM10 compared to concurrent indoor or outdoor concentrations—the so-called "personal cloud," a second topic for further research. The impact of outdoor air particles on indoor concentrations was considered. Equilibrium mass balance models indicate that this is a function of the penetration P through the building envelope, the air exchange rate a, and the particle decay rate k. EPA's PTEAM Study provided an estimate for k of 0.39 h 1 for fine particles and 1.01 h 1 for coarse particles. Two studies suggest that P = 1 for PM10. Using these results, the fraction of outdoor air PM2 s and PM10 particles found indoors at a given air exchange rate can be calculated. The protective effect of reducing air exchange rates during periods of high outdoor particle pollution can thus be quantified. Most studies showed poor correlations of personal exposures with outdoor concentrations. However, for those studies with seven or more repeated measurements, longitudinal regressions on exposures of individual subjects showed much improved correlations with outdoor particle concentrations. This new finding provides some support for the epidemiological findings of increased morbidity and mortality associated with higher outdoor particle concentrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
KLEPEIS, N. E., NELSON, W. C., OTT, W. R., ROBINSON, J. P., TSANG, A. M., SWITZER, P., BEHAR, J. V., HERN, S. C., & ENGELMANN, W. H. (2001) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165 · Cited by 4,803
Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences
Zeger, S. L., Thomas, D., Dominici, F., Samet, J. M., Schwartz, J., Dockery, D., & Cohen, A. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108419 · Cited by 1,156
Kumar, P., Singh, A. B., Arora, T., Singh, S., & Singh, R. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162163 · Cited by 380
Characterization of indoor particle sources: A study conducted in the metropolitan Boston area.
Abt, E., Suh, H. H., Allen, G., & Koutrakis, P. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.0010835 · Cited by 332
Burnett, R. T., Cakmak, S., Brook, J. R., & Krewski, D. (1997) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.97105614 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 98-126
- ISSN
- 1047-3289 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-2247
- 2162-2906
- OpenAlex
- W1973809191
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indoor Particles: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10473289.1996.10467451
- The paper
- Wallace, L. (1996). Indoor Particles: A Review. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1996.10467451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.