The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Indoor Particle Sources Using Continuous Mass and Size Monitors
Open accessAbstract
A comprehensive indoor particle characterization study was conducted in nine Boston-area homes in 1998 in order to characterize sources of PM in indoor environments. State-of-the-art sampling methodologies were used to obtain continuous PM2.5 concentration and size distribution particulate data for both indoor and outdoor air. Study homes, five of which were sampled during two seasons, were monitored over week-long periods. Among other data collected during the extensive monitoring efforts were 24-hr elemental/organic carbon (EC/OC) particulate data as well as semi-continuous air exchange rates and time-activity information. This rich data set shows that indoor particle events tend to be brief, intermittent, and highly variable, thus requiring the use of continuous instrumentation for their characterization. In addition to dramatically increasing indoor PM2.5 concentrations, these data demonstrate that indoor particle events can significantly alter the size distribution and composition of indoor particles. Source event data demonstrate that the impacts of indoor activities are especially pronounced in the ultrafine (da < or = 0.1 micron) and coarse (2.5 < or = da < or = 10 microns) modes. Among the sources of ultrafine particles characterized in this study are indoor ozone/terpene reactions. Furthermore, EC/OC data suggest that organic carbon is a major constituent of particles emitted during indoor source events. Whether exposures to indoor-generated particles, particularly from large short-term peak events, may be associated with adverse health effects will become clearer when biological mechanisms are better known.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities
Dockery, D. W., Pope, C. A., Xu, X., Spengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Fay, M. E., Ferris, B. G., & Speizer, F. E. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312093292401 · Cited by 8,018
Cited by
What are the sources of exposure to eight frequently used phthalic acid esters in Europeans?
Wormuth, M., Scheringer, M., Vollenweider, M., & Hungerbühler, K. (2006) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00770.x · Cited by 1,025
Cleaning products and air fresheners: exposure to primary and secondary air pollutants
Nazaroff, W. W., & Weschler, C. J. (2004) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.040 · Cited by 846
Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses
HE, C. (2004) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.027 · Cited by 585
Abdullahi, K. L., Delgado-Saborit, J. M., & Harrison, R. M. (2013) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.061 · Cited by 565
Weschler, C. J. (2006) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.9256 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, C. M., Suh, H. H., & Koutrakis, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1236-1250
- ISSN
- 1047-3289 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-2247
- 2162-2906
- OpenAlex
- W2045050634
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Indoor Particle Sources Using Continuous Mass and Size Monitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464154
- The paper
- Long, C. M., Suh, H. H., & Koutrakis, P. (2000). Characterization of Indoor Particle Sources Using Continuous Mass and Size Monitors. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.